Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238618›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Interval to Recurrence Affects Survival in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Mioko Matsuo, Kazuki Hashimoto, Ryunosuke Kogo, Masanobu Sato, Tomomi Manako, Takashi Nakagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current and emerging therapeutic strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mioko MatsuoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuki HashimotoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryunosuke KogoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masanobu SatoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomomi ManakoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi NakagawaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: Approximately half of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cases recur, with most recurrences occurring within the first two years after treatment. Although it has been suggested that the interval to recurrence after radical treatment is associated with prognosis in patients with HNSCC, further investigation is needed. Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with HNSCC at Kyushu University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed (n=500). Early recurrence (ER) was defined as disease recurrence within six months of radical treatment, whereas late recurrence (LR) was defined as recurrence after more than six months. Continuous variables were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and categorical variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 234 patients experienced recurrence, with 110 and 124 patients experiencing ER (recurrence within two to six months) and LR (recurrence after six months), respectively. Multivariate analyses identified two independent risk factors for poor prognosis: ER [hazard ratio (HR)=3.200, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.570-6.521, p=0.001] and absence of radiotherapy (HR=0.374, 95%CI=0.191-0.733, p=0.004). In patients with recurrent HNSCC, a short interval to recurrence is a risk factor for poor prognosis and survival. This study demonstrated the prognostic value of ER in these patients. Conclusion: The selection of treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma should consider the timing of recurrence, the initial treatment regimen, and the strategy for changing salvage therapy depending on the recurrence status.

Indexed as

head and neck squamous cell carcinomaInterval to recurrenceplatinum resistanceprognosisradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39238618
PMCPMC11372690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.