Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238599›Full record

ArticleHousing policy debate2024

Does poor health influence residential selection? Understanding mobility among low-income housing voucher recipients in the Moving to Opportunity Study.

Theresa L Osypuk, Samantha Gailey, Nicole M Schmidt, Dolores Acevedo Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Housing policy debate, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theresa L OsypukUniversity of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, and Director of the Minnesota Population Center.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-3346
Samantha GaileyUniversity of Minnesota, Minnesota Population Center; Assistant Professor, Michigan State University, Departments of Public Health and Forestry.ORCID 0000-0002-4654-1211
Nicole M SchmidtUniversity of Minnesota, Minnesota Population Center.
Dolores Acevedo GarciaYouth and Family Policy, Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-1852

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Interdisciplinary Population Health Science Training: Linking Multilevel Forces Across TimeT32HD095134 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK, John Robert Warren · 2019 to 2026
$2.5M
Health, Neighborhood Context, and MobilityR01HD090014 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Compact Chemical Sensor for Measurement of Internal Dose of Environmental AgentsR44ES018001 · NIEHS · AGILTRON, INC. · PI WEIMER, WAYNE · 2012 to 2013
$986k
Residential trajectories and adolescent health: results from a randomized trialR03HD080848 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2014 to 2015
$164k
Compact Chemical Sensor for Measurement of Internal Dose of Environmental AgentsR43ES018001 · NIEHS · AGILTRON, INC. · PI CLARKE, RICHARD H · 2010 to 2010
$100k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090014NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD080848NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD095134NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES018001NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES018001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Housing mobility programs and housing choice vouchers provide low-income families with a potentially-transformative opportunity to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. However, families often face barriers to attaining upward residential mobility; poor health may be one important barrier, although few studies have examined this hypothesis. We used the experimental Moving to Opportunity (MTO) Study, constructed residential trajectories, and linked neighborhood opportunity measures to over 14,000 addresses of 3526 families across 7 years. We used latent growth curve longitudinal models to test how baseline health modified effects of MTO housing voucher treatment on neighborhood opportunity trajectories. Results show that poor baseline health adversely influenced how the voucher induced upward mobility. Voucher receipt strongly promoted residential mobility if families were healthy; moreover the low-poverty neighborhood voucher plus counseling treatment promoted higher opportunity neighborhood attainment compared to controls, regardless of the baseline health of the family. However families with health vulnerabilities did not retain the same initial neighborhood gains conferred by the housing choice voucher treatment, as families without health vulnerabilities. These results suggest that housing counseling may be one necessary element to expand neighborhood choice into higher opportunity neighborhoods for families with health challenges. Providing housing vouchers alone are insufficient to promote low-income family high opportunity moves, for families who have disabilities or special needs. The implications of these results point to scaling up housing mobility programs, to provide tailored support for low-income families to use housing choice vouchers to make high opportunity moves, which is particularly necessary for families with health challenges.

Indexed as

biasdisabilityhealthhousing choice voucherhousing mobilityhousing policyneighborhoodresidential mobilityresidential selectionspecial needs children

Identifiers

PMID39238599
PMCPMC11374104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.