Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Deep learning model shows pathologist-level detection of sentinel node metastasis of melanoma and intra-nodal nevi on whole slide images.

Jan Siarov, Angelica Siarov, Darshan Kumar, John Paoli, Johan Mölne, Noora Neittaanmäki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Defensive medicine in dermatological practice - Dermatopathology as a mirror of structural challenges.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Deep Learning Image Processing Models in Dermatopathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. [State of digitalization in dermatopathology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan SiarovDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Angelica SiarovDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Darshan KumarAiforia Technologies Plc., Helsinki, Finland.
John PaoliDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan MölneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Noora NeittaanmäkiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nodal metastasis (NM) in sentinel node biopsies (SNB) is crucial for melanoma staging. However, an intra-nodal nevus (INN) may often be misclassified as NM, leading to potential misdiagnosis and incorrect staging. There is high discordance among pathologists in assessing SNB positivity, which may lead to false staging. Digital whole slide imaging offers the potential for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in digital pathology. In this study, we assessed the capability of AI to detect NM and INN in SNBs. Methods: A total of 485 hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs), including NM and INN from 196 SNBs, were collected and divided into training (279 WSIs), validation (89 WSIs), and test sets (117 WSIs). A deep learning model was trained with 5,956 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI and three blinded dermatopathologists assessed the test set, with immunohistochemistry serving as the reference standard. Results: The AI model showed excellent performance with an area under the curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.965 for detecting NM. In comparison, the AUC for NM detection among dermatopathologists ranged between 0.94 and 0.98. For the detection of INN, the AUC was lower for both AI (0.781) and dermatopathologists (range of 0.63-0.79). Discussion: In conclusion, the deep learning AI model showed excellent accuracy in detecting NM, achieving dermatopathologist-level performance in detecting both NM and INN. Importantly, the AI model showed the potential to differentiate between these two entities. However, further validation is warranted.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdermatopathologydigital pathologyintra-nodal nevusintra-nodal nevus deep learningnodal melanoma metastasissentinel node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39238597
PMCPMC11374739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.