Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Migration of an intrauterine device to the posterior urethra with stone formation: a case report.

Chuanfeng Liu, Yongqiang Xia, Qingtan Pang, Zichao Zhao, Jianfang Zhao

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chuanfeng LiuDepartment of Urology, Linyi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Yongqiang XiaDepartment of Urology, Linyi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Qingtan PangDepartment of Urology, Linyi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Zichao ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Linyi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Jianfang ZhaoDepartment of Gynecology, Linyi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migration of an intrauterine device (IUD) to the posterior urethra with stone formation has not been previously reported in the literature. A 42-year-old female patient presented to the gynecology clinic with a complaint of "discovered vaginal mass for 2 years, with growth for 5 days." She was referred to urology on suspicion of IUD migration to the bladder. Physical examination revealed a hard mass palpable on the anterior vaginal wall. Laboratory tests showed normal blood counts, and urinalysis indicated a mild urinary tract infection. Ultrasound and pelvic X-ray indicated IUD migration to the bladder and bladder stones. Cystoscopy revealed that the IUD had migrated to the posterior urethra with stone formation. Holmium laser was used to fragment the stones encasing the IUD's one arm, and the IUD was successfully removed with grasping forceps. The patient had a urinary catheter placed for 10 days and was followed up for 20 days. During the follow-up, there were no lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or vaginal leakage. To our knowledge, we report the first case of an IUD migrating through the vesicovaginal space to the posterior urethra. Endoscopic removal of the IUD is feasible and safe. Urologists and gynecologists should not limit their diagnosis to IUD migration to the bladder but should also consider the possibility of urethral migration.

Indexed as

bladder stoneendoscopyintrauterine devicemigrationurethra

Identifiers

PMID39238594
PMCPMC11375611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.