ArticleInterventional pain medicine2022
Single center experience on the rate of discontinuation and safety of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections using the modified approach in an office setting without sedation.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Safety profile of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections performed while maintaining anticoagulation, aspirin, or NSAIDs.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- FACTFINDERS FOR PATIENT SAFETY: Minimizing risks with cervical epidural injections.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
- Inter-rater reliability of MRI superior articular process angle measurement for use in the modified approach to cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections.Interventional pain medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) are commonly used in the treatment of upper extremity radicular pain. Recently, a modification of the conventional technique has been developed and validated which has a theoretical safety advantage of less risk of needle contact of the spinal nerve and vertebral artery. The new approach involves a needle trajectory under fluoroscopic guidance which is directly based upon the specific superior articular process angle measurement on MRI. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discontinuation rate of the modified approach CTFESI procedure in a non-sedated patient population. The study was also undertaken to confirm the safety of the procedure in an office-based setting. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the authors' (DL, SH) practice to identify all CTFESI using the modified approach, performed between October 2018 through January 2021 through a query of the investigators' (DL and SH) electronic medical record system. Any discontinued CTFESI procedure was identified. The reason for discontinuation was determined through medical record review. In addition, any significant neurologic or cardiovascular event occurring during or immediately following any completed or discontinued CTFESI was identified. Mild vasovagal reaction was not considered a significant complication. Results: A total of 973 CTFESI procedures were performed using the modified approach during the study period. Twelve procedures, 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-2.1%) were discontinued. Nine were aborted due to vascular flow not resolved with needle repositioning. Only three, 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.9) were aborted due to patient intolerance. There were zero significant neurologic or cardiovascular complications. Conclusion: The performance of the modified approach CTFESI appears to be well tolerated with a very low rate, 0.3%, of discontinuation due to intolerance in non-sedated patients. The zero incidence of neurologic or cardiovascular complication contributes to the current literature on the safety of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.