ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2024
Epley Maneuver Skills in Primary Care: 3D Semicircular Canal Models for Self-Learning.
Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Posterior canal-type benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is commonly treated using the Epley maneuver; however, the maneuver's use in primary care is limited by insufficient expertise. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D) semicircular canal model as a self-learning tool for primary care physicians to improve their Epley maneuver technique. Methods: Thirty-one participants (18 family physicians, seven residents, and six medical students) performed the Dix-Hallpike maneuver on a nursing manikin, followed by the Epley maneuver on the covered 3D models before and after a 5-minute self-study period with the uncovered 3D model. We measured the number of moved beads from posterior canal into the utricle of the 3D model, time spent on the Epley maneuver, and head suspension angle of the Dix-Hallpike maneuver. Results: Preintervention performance was divided into a skilled group (n=7) that could move almost all the beads and an unskilled group (n=24) that could move a few beads. Postintervention, the unskilled group members significantly improved their skill: The average moved beads increased from 0.35 to 8.00, maneuver time from 26.1 to 35.8 seconds, and head suspension angle from 10.3° to 16.4°. Most participants recognized the importance of correct positioning and spent adequate time. Conclusions: The 3D model was effective as a self-learning tool for improving Epley maneuver performance, particularly for less experienced practitioners. This approach could bridge the gap between evidence and practice in primary care for BPPV treatment, enhancing patient outcomes and reducing the need for specialist referrals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.