ArticleJournal of radiation research2024
Luminal progenitor and mature cells are more susceptible than basal cells to radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in rat mammary tissue.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competitive cell transplantation in rat mammary tissue and its use for radiation-induced cell competition and tumor clonality assays.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Low- and high-dose-rate radiation exposure alters the cellular composition and dynamics of the rat mammary epithelium for weeks preceding carcinogenesis.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Trans-Scale Insights into Variability in Radiation Cancer Risk Across Tissues, Individuals, and Species.Biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ionizing radiation promotes mammary carcinogenesis. Induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is the initial event after radiation exposure, which can potentially lead to carcinogenesis, but the dynamics of DSB induction and repair are not well understood at the tissue level. In this study, we used female rats, which have been recognized as a useful experimental model for studying radiation effects on the mammary gland. We focused on differences in DSB kinetics among basal cells, luminal progenitor and mature cells in different parts of the mammary duct. 53BP1 foci were used as surrogate markers of DSBs, and 53BP1 foci in each mammary epithelial cell in immunostained tissue sections were counted 1-24 h after irradiation and fitted to an exponential function of time. Basal cells were identified as cytokeratin (CK) 14+ cells, luminal progenitor cells as CK8 + 18low cells and luminal mature cells as CK8 + 18high cells. The number of DSBs per nucleus tended to be higher in luminal cells than basal cells at 1 h post-irradiation. A model analysis indicated that basal cells in terminal end buds (TEBs), which constitute the leading edge of the mammary duct, had significantly fewer initial DSBs than the two types of luminal cells, and there was no significant difference in initial amount among the cell types in the subtending duct. The repair rate did not differ among mammary epithelial cell types or their locations. Thus, luminal progenitor and mature cells are more susceptible to radiation-induced DSBs than are basal cells in TEBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.