Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238283›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2025

Placement, management and complications associated with peripheral intravenous catheter use in UK small animal practice.

E Haskey, V Maund, F Allerton, B Browse, C Heard, C O'Donnell, K Davison, C Hertel, E Booth, S Lawrence and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

E HaskeyClinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Potters Bar, UK.
V MaundWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Solihull, UK.
F AllertonWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Solihull, UK.
B BrowseCave Veterinary Specialists, Wellington, UK.
C HeardHighcroft Veterinary Specialists, Bristol, UK.
C O'DonnellParagon Veterinary Referrals, Wakefield, UK.
K DavisonParagon Veterinary Referrals, Wakefield, UK.
C HertelQuarry Veterinary Group, Shrewsbury, UK.
E BoothQuarry Veterinary Group, Shrewsbury, UK.
S LawrenceDavies Veterinary Specialists, Hertfordshire, UK.
E DeverKentdale Referrals, Milnthorpe, UK.
L BoweKentdale Referrals, Milnthorpe, UK.
H TaylorDick White Referrals, Cambridgeshire, UK.
K HallDick White Referrals, Cambridgeshire, UK.
K TrimbleWear Referrals Veterinary Specialist & Emergency Hospital, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
M JuniorWear Referrals Veterinary Specialist & Emergency Hospital, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
C FennellSouthfields Veterinary Specialists, Essex, UK.
N StevensonGarston Veterinary Group, Somerset, UK.
A SterrittTaverham Veterinary Hospital, Norwich, UK.
E PennWillows Veterinary Group, Cheshire, UK.
L NowellStation House Vets, York, UK.
A CollinsVillage Vets, Ellesmere Port, UK.
E JonesNorth Wales Veterinary Referrals, Buckley, UK.
C ScudderClinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Potters Bar, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9896-9893

Funding

Small Animal Medicine Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the techniques for preparation and placement of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs), to describe the complications associated with PIVCs, and to identify factors associated with PIVC complications in small animal practice in the United Kingdom. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective multicentre observational study was undertaken between January 2022 and January 2023. Data collected included patient information, information regarding the placement and maintenance of PIVCs, and PIVC complications, from privately owned cats and dogs presenting to veterinary institutes in the United Kingdom. Patients required a PIVC to be placed as part of their care and the PIVC was anticipated to be in situ for >24 hours to be eligible for PIVC complication analysis.

resultsA total of 19 institutes recorded data regarding 382 PIVCs, with 325 (85.1%) placed in dogs and 57 (14.9%) in cats. The most common reasons for placement were to administer intravenous fluid therapy (74.3%) and intravenous medications (71.7%). There were 102 of 382 (26.7%) PIVCs associated with a complication, with limb swelling/suspected phlebitis in 44 of 382 (11.5%) and PIVC dislodgement/patient interference in 30 of 382 (7.9%) PIVCs. Factors associated with increased risk of complication were more than 1 attempt to place the PIVC, a second or subsequent PIVC being placed during hospitalisation, flush frequency different than every 1 to 24 hours, and flush solution with compound sodium lactate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Veterinary professionals must be vigilant when monitoring a patient with a PIVC in situ, particularly if a PIVC is associated with one of the aforementioned factors of increased likelihood of complication.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralVeterinary MedicineAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMalePhlebitisProspective StudiesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39238283
PMCPMC11736090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.