Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238159›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Impact of different feed intake levels on intestinal morphology and epithelial cell differentiation in piglets.

Xin Wang, Lanmei Yin, Chunchun Geng, Jiaqi Zhang, Jianzhong Li, Pengfei Huang, Yali Li, Qiye Wang, Huansheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Lanmei YinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Chunchun GengHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Jiaqi ZhangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Jianzhong LiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Pengfei HuangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Yali LiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.
Qiye WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-2341
Huansheng YangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Human Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1164-5771

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130099Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2024JJ6310Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20230779Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province 2022RC3060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of feed intake levels on the development of intestinal morphology and epithelial cell differentiation in piglets. Sixty-four 35-d-old healthy weaned piglets ([Large White × Landrace] × Duroc) with an initial weight (6.93 ± 0.12 kg) were randomly divided into 4 groups (100%, 80%, 40%, and 20% feed intake) with 8 replicates of 2 pigs each. Samples were collected on days 3 and 7. The results revealed that with an increase in feed restriction degree and time, the body weight and organ index of piglets significantly decreased, and the villus height (VH) and crypt depth of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum also decreased linearly (P < 0.05). After 3 d of feed restriction, jejunal ki67, endocrine cells, goblet cells, and villus endocrine/VH all decreased linearly, but the villus cup/VH ratio increased linearly, and the 40% and 20% were significantly higher than those of the 100% and 80% (P < 0.05). There was also a linear decrease in jejunal ki67, endocrine cells, goblet cells, and villous endocrine/VH in piglets fed 7 d of food restriction; however, the villus goblet cells/VH ratio in the 20% was significantly higher than that in the 40% group and was not different from that in the 80% (P < 0.05). During 3 d of feed restriction, the expression of jejunal differentiation marker genes showed a linear decreasing trend (P < 0.05) but increased linearly after 7 d of feed restriction. The expression levels of interleukin17 (IL-17) and IL-22 also increased linearly (P < 0.05). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and gene set enrichment analysis analyses indicated that the PPAR signaling pathway, ECM-receptor interaction, and Th1, Th2, and Th17 cell differentiation were significantly enriched in these processes. real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that both PPAR and ECM-receptor interactions were significantly activated during 7 d of feeding restriction (P < 0.05). The results showed that with an increase in feed restriction intensity and time, the intestinal morphology and epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation were significantly reduced, except for the goblet cells. This phenomenon is related to the regulation of intestinal differentiation by IL-17 and IL-22 secreted by the Th cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEpithelial CellsAnimal FeedAnimalsDietEatingIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMaleRandom AllocationSwinefeed intake levelintestinal epithelial cellintestinal morphologyintestinal proliferation and differentiationpiglet

Identifiers

PMID39238159
PMCPMC11705090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.