Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238142›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of paediatric dentistry2025

Feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of weighted blankets during paediatric dental care.

Leah I Stein Duker, Riley McGuire, Jocelyn Hernandez, Elizabeth Goodman, José C Polido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah I Stein DukerChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy at the Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Riley McGuireChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy at the Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jocelyn HernandezChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy at the Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Elizabeth GoodmanChan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy at the Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
José C PolidoChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Sensory Adapted Dental Environments to Enhance Oral Care for Children with and without Dental Fear and AnxietyUH3DE031222 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Leah I. Stein Duker · 2024 to 2026
$2.9M
Sensory Adapted Dental Environments to Enhance Oral Care for Children with and without Dental Fear and AnxietyUG3DE031222 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STEIN DUKER, LEAH I. · 2022 to 2023
$664k
NIDCR NIH HHS UG3 DE031222NIDCR NIH HHS UH3 DE031222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeighted blankets are one method to provide deep pressure touch sensations, which are associated with a calming effect on the nervous system. Weighted blankets have been reported to elicit a calming effect during stressful dental encounters and routine prophylactic visits in older adolescents and adults. Preliminary research suggests that weighted blankets are safe and feasible for children in both hospital and home settings; this, however, has not yet been examined in a paediatric dental environment.

aimTo examine the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of a weighted blanket during paediatric dental care.

designThis cross-sectional study examined child, caregiver, and dentist-reported responses to survey questions asking about their experience with the weighted blanket during care (n = 20 each per child and caregiver group, n = 9 dentists).

resultsThe use of a weighted blanket is feasible, acceptable, and appropriate as reported by caregivers and dentists (means ≥ 4.70 on the Feasibility of Intervention, Acceptability of Intervention, and Intervention Appropriateness Measures). Few problems were described, and all groups overwhelmingly responded with enthusiasm, noted the blanket's potential for future use, and perceived that a weighted blanket improved care (means ≥ 4.10).

conclusionsStudy findings support the feasibility and acceptability of using a weighted blanket during routine, noninvasive paediatric dental care.

Indexed as

Dental AnxietyDental Care for ChildrenAdolescentCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesacceptabilitydeep pressuredental fearfeasibilityweighted blanket

Identifiers

PMID39238142
PMCPMC11880347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.