Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237999›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Food and beverage manufacturing and retailing company policies and commitments to improve the healthfulness of Canadian food environments.

Alexa Gaucher-Holm, Jasmine Chan, Gary Sacks, Caroline Vaillancourt, Laura Vergeer, Monique Potvin Kent, Dana Lee Olstad, Lana Vanderlee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexa Gaucher-HolmÉcole de nutrition, Centre NUTRISS (Nutrition, santé et société), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels, Université Laval, 2425 Rue de L'Agriculture, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Jasmine ChanGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation (IHT), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation (IHT), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Caroline VaillancourtÉcole de nutrition, Centre NUTRISS (Nutrition, santé et société), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels, Université Laval, 2425 Rue de L'Agriculture, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Laura VergeerSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Monique Potvin KentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Dana Lee OlstadDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lana VanderleeÉcole de nutrition, Centre NUTRISS (Nutrition, santé et société), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels, Université Laval, 2425 Rue de L'Agriculture, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. lana.vanderlee@fsaa.ulaval.ca.

Funding

CIHR #PJT-173367Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 312301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood and beverage companies play a central role in shaping the healthfulness of food environments.

methodsThe BIA-Obesity tool was used to evaluate and benchmark the specificity, comprehensiveness and transparency of the food environment-related policies and commitments of leading food and beverage manufacturing and retailing companies in Canada. Policies and commitments related to the healthfulness of food environments within 6 action areas were assessed: 1) corporate nutrition strategy; 2) product (re)formulation; 3) nutrition information and labelling; 4) product and brand promotion; 5) product accessibility; and 6) disclosure of relationships with external organizations. Data were collected from publicly available sources, and companies were invited to supplement and validate information collected by the research team. Each company was then assigned a score out of 100 for each action area, and an overall BIA-Obesity score out of 100.

resultsOverall BIA-Obesity scores for manufacturers ranged from 18 to 75 out of 100 (median = 49), while scores for retailers ranged from 21 to 25 (median = 22). Scores were highest within the product (re)formulation (median = 60) followed by the corporate nutrition strategy (median = 59) domain for manufacturers, while retailers performed best within the corporate nutrition strategy (median = 53), followed by the disclosure of relationships with external organizations (median = 47) domain. Companies within both sectors performed worst within the product accessibility domain (medians = 8 and 0 for manufacturers and retailers, respectively).

conclusionsThis study highlights important limitations to self-regulatory approaches of the food and beverage industry to improve the healthfulness of food environments. Although some companies had specific, comprehensive, and transparent policies and commitments to address the healthfulness of food environments in Canada, most fell short of recommended best-practice. Additional mandatory government policies and regulations may be warranted to effectively transform Canadian food environments to promote healthier diets and prevent related non-communicable diseases.

Indexed as

Food IndustryNutrition PolicyBeveragesCanadaCommerceDiet, HealthyFood LabelingHealth PromotionHumansObesityAccountabilityBIA-ObesityFood and beverage industryFood environmentGrocery retailNon-communicable diseaseNutrition policy

Identifiers

PMID39237999
PMCPMC11375943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.