Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237995›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2024

Developing a Global Strategy for strengthening the occupational therapy workforce: a two-phased mixed-methods consultation of country representatives shows the need for clarifying task-sharing strategies.

Sutanuka Bhattacharjya, Sarah Curtis, Supakorn Kueakomoldej, Claudia von Zweck, Giuliano Russo, Karthik Mani, Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, Ritchard Ledgerd, Tiago S Jesus, World Federation of Occupational Therapists

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sutanuka BhattacharjyaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sarah CurtisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Supakorn KueakomoldejCenter for Education in Health Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Claudia von ZweckWorld Federation of Occupational Therapists, Geneva, Switzerland.
Giuliano RussoWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Karthik ManiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Sureshkumar KamalakannanDepartment of Social Work, Education and Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ritchard LedgerdWorld Federation of Occupational Therapists, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tiago S JesusDivision of Occupational Therapy, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. tiago.jesus@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1300-6308
World Federation of Occupational Therapists

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOccupational therapy has been underdeveloped and often neglected in the global health workforce agenda, contrasting with the global rise of population needs for services. The World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) is utilizing a research-based, multi-step process for developing a Global Strategy for strengthening the occupational therapist workforce. A multi-pronged scoping review, situational analysis, and expert input process enabled the drafting of a provisional Global Strategy. Here, feedback on that draft from representatives of WFOT member organizations was obtained and analyzed as one key intermediate step toward shaping the in-developing Strategy's content and structure.

methodsTwo-phased, mixed-methods consultation consisting of: (1) online survey with score ratings and comments on the utility of each strategy and (2) four in-person focus groups discussions on low-scoring items involving a total of 76 representatives of WFOT member organizations. The focus group discussions were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

resultsStrategies involving 'task shifting/task sharing' or the 'harmonization of workforce data-collection requirements' received the lowest scores in the initial survey and were thereby addressed in the focus groups discussions. The overarching theme of the focus groups was the need to: "clarify, specify, and contextualize the strategies", including: (1) "clarify the terminology and specify the application", for example, describe the meaning of task shifting, specify which tasks can (and cannot) be shifted and to whom, to address concerns regarding scope-of-practice, service demand, and safety; and (2) "outline the context of need and the context for the implementation" of the strategies, elucidating why the strategies are needed and how they can be feasibly implemented across the different jurisdictional contexts.

conclusionWithin a mixed-methods consultation, WFOT representatives identified challenging topics on the draft workforce strategies and suggested methods to improve the Global Strategy, its acceptability, and implementation. The terms 'task shifting/task sharing' raised the greatest discussion among the profession leaders, when the strategy was not sufficiently clarified, specified, or contextualized.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsGlobal HealthOccupational TherapyHealth WorkforceHumansOccupational TherapistsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceConsultationFocus groupsHealth workforceOccupational therapyTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID39237995
PMCPMC11375928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.