Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237978›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Breaking the cycle of reoccurring low back pain with integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy to facilitate education and exercise advice: a superiority randomised controlled trial study protocol.

Estelle D Watson, Paul W Marshall, Natalie M V Morrison, Niamh Moloney, Paul O'Halloran, Martin Rabey, Imran Khan Niazi, Kirk Stevens, Michael Kingsley

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Estelle D WatsonDepartment of Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. estelle.watson@auckland.ac.nz.
Paul W MarshallDepartment of Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Natalie M V MorrisonTranslational Health Research Institute Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Niamh MoloneyFaculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Paul O'HalloranSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Martin RabeyFaculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kirk StevensCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael KingsleyDepartment of Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-specific low back pain is a common and costly global issue. Many people with low back pain live for years with ongoing symptom recurrence and disability, making it crucial to find effective prevention strategies. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based patient-centred counselling style that helps motivate individuals to change their behaviours. In combination, MI and cognitive-behavioural therapy (MI-CBT) has the potential to yield long term improvements in pain and disability and reduce incidence of recurrence.

methodThis is a two-arm superiority randomised controlled trial comparing MI-CBT and Education (n = 83) with Education only (n = 83). Participants that have recovered from a recent episode of non-specific low back pain (7th consecutive day with pain ≤ 2 on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale) will be eligible for inclusion into the study. Both groups will receive five 30-min sessions over a 10-week period as well as the Navigating Pain booklet, homework book and a standardised exercise programme. In the intervention group, MI-CBT techniques will be used to provide individualised support, identify beliefs, and increase engagement with the resources provided. Outcomes measures include pain (current and in the last 7 days) as rated on the numeric pain rating scale. This will be used to determine recurrence (number of participants who report back pain ≥ 3 out of 10 on the numeric pain rating scale). Furthermore, self-reported (1) pain intensity; (2) pain catastrophizing; (3) fear-avoidance beliefs; (4) pain self-efficacy; (5) depression and anxiety; (6) disability will be measured. All outcomes will be measured at baseline, and again at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post allocation. DISCUSSION: The effective delivery of self-management strategies to prevent recurrence of low back pain is an important aspect that requires urgent attention. This study will provide new information on the effectiveness of using an MI-CBT approach to facilitate self-management through education and exercise to improve low back pain outcomes. Evidence emerging from this trial has the potential to inform clinical practice and healthcare management of non-specific low back pain.

trial registrationProspectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12623000746639 (10/07/2023).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyLow Back PainMotivational InterviewingPatient Education as TopicAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicExercise TherapyHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceMotivational interviewing; Cognitive behavioural therapy; Low back pain

Identifiers

PMID39237978
PMCPMC11375947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.