Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237957›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024

Is time to first CT scan in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury prolonged when prehospital arterial cannulation is performed? A retrospective non-inferiority study.

Michael Eichlseder, Sebastian Labenbacher, Alexander Pichler, Michael Eichinger, Thomas Kuenzer, Philipp Zoidl, Barbara Hallmann, Felix Stelzl, Nikolaus Schreiber, Paul Zajic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Intraarterial blood pressure monitoring in prehospital emergency care: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael EichlsederDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian LabenbacherDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. sebastian.labenbacher@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-1528
Alexander PichlerDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Michael EichingerDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Thomas KuenzerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Philipp ZoidlDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Barbara HallmannDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Felix StelzlMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nikolaus SchreiberDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 2, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Paul ZajicDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.

resultsWe included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).

conclusionTime-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Medical ServicesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedCatheterization, PeripheralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnaesthesiaArterial pressureBlood pressureBrain InjuriesEmergency medical servicesHemodynamic monitoringIntubationTraumatic

Identifiers

PMID39237957
PMCPMC11375988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.