ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Data privacy-aware machine learning approach in pancreatic cancer diagnosis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- AI Privacy and Security in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026Article
- Overcoming resistance to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: mechanisms, combination strategies, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered a highly lethal cancer due to its advanced stage diagnosis. The five-year survival rate after diagnosis is less than 10%. However, if diagnosed early, the five-year survival rate can reach up to 70%. Early diagnosis of PDAC can aid treatment and improve survival rates by taking necessary precautions. The challenge is to develop a reliable, data privacy-aware machine learning approach that can accurately diagnose pancreatic cancer with biomarkers.
aimThe study aims to diagnose a patient's pancreatic cancer while ensuring the confidentiality of patient records. In addition, the study aims to guide researchers and clinicians in developing innovative methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer.
methodsMachine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, can identify patterns by analyzing large datasets. The study pre-processed a dataset containing urine biomarkers with operations such as filling in missing values, cleaning outliers, and feature selection. The data was encrypted using the Fernet encryption algorithm to ensure confidentiality. Ten separate machine learning models were applied to predict individuals with PDAC. Performance metrics such as F1 score, recall, precision, and accuracy were used in the modeling process.
resultsAmong the 590 clinical records analyzed, 199 (33.7%) belonged to patients with pancreatic cancer, 208 (35.3%) to patients with non-cancerous pancreatic disorders (such as benign hepatobiliary disease), and 183 (31%) to healthy individuals. The LGBM algorithm showed the highest efficiency by achieving an accuracy of 98.8%. The accuracy of the other algorithms ranged from 98 to 86%. In order to understand which features are more critical and which data the model is based on, the analysis found that the features "plasma_CA19_9", REG1A, TFF1, and LYVE1 have high importance levels. The LIME analysis also analyzed which features of the model are important in the decision-making process.
conclusionsThis research outlines a data privacy-aware machine learning tool for predicting PDAC. The results show that a promising approach can be presented for clinical application. Future research should expand the dataset and focus on validation by applying it to various populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.