Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2024
Therapeutic effect of a single lumbar puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tear fluid Calcitonin gene-related peptide in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension headache - a prospective case-control study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Acute headache treatment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: treating to the phenotype?The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Metabolic Dysfunction in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Current Theories and Updates.Aging and disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurological disorder characterized by increased intracranial pressure. Whilst lumbar puncture (LP) is necessary for the diagnosis of IIH, its therapeutic effect remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of a single LP in people with IIH (pwIIH).
methodsIn this prospective observational study, we analysed short-term neurological and ophthalmological outcomes in pwIIH before, one (D1) and seven days (D7) after the LP. The primary outcome was the change in papilledema degree from baseline. Secondary outcomes included visual outcomes, morphological changes in optical coherence tomography (peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer [pRNFL] thickness and ganglion cell layer [GCL] volume) and transbulbar sonography (arachnoid optic nerve sheath diameter [AONSD]), and headache outcomes (peak and median headache severity and burden related to headache).
resultsWe included 30 pwIIH (mean age 32.8 years [SD 8.4], 93.3% female, median cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] opening pressure 33.0 cmCSF [IQR 26.9-35.3], median body mass index (BMI) 34.8 kg/m
conclusionsThis short-term follow-up study in pwIIH undergoing a single LP suggests a moderate effect on ophthalmological but not headache outcomes. The usefulness of LP as a therapeutic measure in IIH remains controversial and should likely be reserved for patients with limited treatment options, e.g., in pregnancy or intolerability to medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.