ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025
Unraveling the mechanisms of high-level gait control in functional gait disorders.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Co-occurrence of dissociation and anxiety and depressive disorders in adults: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal assessment of clinical and neural changes following multidisciplinary management in functional motor disorders.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Identifying diagnostic biomarkers in functional motor disorders through multimodal behavioral, neurophysiological, and imaging assessment using explainable machine learning.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Differential effects of static and dynamic visual prompts on attention-motor performance: the role of sustained attention after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional gait disorders (FGDs) are a disabling subset of Functional Neurological Disorders in which presenting symptoms arise from altered high-level motor control. The dual-task paradigm can be used to investigate mechanisms of high-level gait control. The study aimed to determine the objective measures of gait that best discriminate between individuals with FGDs and healthy controls and the relationship with disease severity and duration. High-level spatiotemporal gait outcomes were analyzed in 87 patients with FGDs (79.3% women, average age 41.9±14.7 years) and 48 healthy controls (60.4% women, average age 41.9±15.7 years) on single and motor, cognitive, and visual-fixation dual tasks. The area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operator characteristic plot and the dual-task effect (DTE) were calculated for each measure. Dual-task interference on the top single-task gait characteristics was determined by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Stride time variability and its standard deviation (SD) failed to discriminate between the two groups in single and dual-task conditions (AUC<0.80 for all). Significant group x task interactions were observed for swing time SD and stride time on the cognitive dual tasks (p<0.035 for all). Longer disease duration was associated with poor gait performance and unsteadiness in motor and cognitive DTE (p<0.003) but improvement in stride length and swing time on the visual dual tasks (p<0.041). Our preliminary findings shed light on measures of gait automaticity as a diagnostic and prognostic gait biomarker and underline the importance of early diagnosis and management in individuals with FGDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.