Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237735›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing the role of evolutionary information for enhancing protein language model embeddings.

Kyra Erckert, Burkhard Rost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PEGASUS: Prediction of MD-derived protein flexibility from sequence.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. A large language model for predicting neurotoxic peptides and neurotoxins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. bindNode24: Competitive binding residue prediction with 60 % smaller model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyra ErckertTUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748, Garching/Munich, Germany. kyra.erckert@tum.de.
Burkhard RostTUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748, Garching/Munich, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031L0168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embeddings from protein Language Models (pLMs) are replacing evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) as the most successful input for protein prediction. Is this because embeddings capture evolutionary information? We tested various approaches to explicitly incorporate evolutionary information into embeddings on various protein prediction tasks. While older pLMs (SeqVec, ProtBert) significantly improved through MSAs, the more recent pLM ProtT5 did not benefit. For most tasks, pLM-based outperformed MSA-based methods, and the combination of both even decreased performance for some (intrinsic disorder). We highlight the effectiveness of pLM-based methods and find limited benefits from integrating MSAs.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProteinsSequence AlignmentAlgorithmsComputational BiologySequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteinsEmbeddingsEvolutionary informationMachine learningMultiple sequence alignmentsProtein language modelsProtein structure predictionSecondary structure

Identifiers

PMID39237735
PMCPMC11377704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.