ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
The surgical role of C1 nerve root identification for the disconnection of the spinal dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction: a single center restrospective experience.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microsurgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Comment on "The surgical role of C1 nerve root identification for the disconnection of the spinal dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction: a single center restrospective experience".Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to discuss the identification of the C1 nerve root as an effective surgical approach to successfully locate the shunting point of craniocervical junction spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (CCJ-SDAVF) intraoperatively. This study included all patients with CCJ-SDAVF who underwent surgical treatment using the far-lateral transcondylar approach at a single institution from January 2017 to June 2023. Data on patient demographics, clinical and angiographic characteristics of CCJ-SDAVF, surgical details, and treatment outcomes were collected. Follow-up assessments were conducted for all patients until December 31, 2023. The study included a total of 7 patients, comprising 5 men(71.4%) and 2 women (28.6%), with an average age of 57.6 years. Among them, 4 patients (57.1%) developed diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH), while 2 patients (28.6%) experienced progressive cervical myelopathy. The shunting points of all CCJ-SDAVFs, which exhibited engorged veins, were identified next to the C1 root. Complete obliteration of CCJ-SDAVFs was successfully achieved in all patients, as confirmed by postoperative angiography one month later. No recurrent CCJ-SDAVFs were observed two years after the operation. Among the patients, 5 (71.4%) experienced good functional recovery, as indicated by an mRS score ranging from 0 to 1, while the remaining 2 patients (28.6%) showed incomplete functional recovery. The surgical interruption of CCJ-SDAVFs is the preferred treatment option, given its high obliteration rate and favorable functional recovery outcomes. We advocate the identification of C1 spinal nerve root as a crucial surgical step to identify the shunting points of CCJ- SDAVFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39237692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.