ArticleScientific reports2024
Effectiveness of remote ischaemic conditioning is not affected by hyper-inflammation in a rat model of stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inflammation and coagulopathy during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impairs the efficiency of the current stroke treatments. Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) has shown potential in recent years to protect the brain and other organs against pathological conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of RIC in brain infarct size using TTC staining and lung injury reduction by H&E staining during the hyper-inflammatory response in rats. The inflammation and coagulopathy were assessed by sedimentation rate, haematocrit, systemic oxidative stress and clotting time. Moreover, we observed changes in the cytokine profile. The results of the first part of the experiment showed that the inflammation and lung injury are fully developed after 24 h of intratracheal LPS administration. At this time, we induced focal brain ischaemia and examined the effect of RIC pre- and post-treatment. Our results showed that RIPre-C reduced the infarct size by about 23%, while RIPost-C by about 30%. The lung injury was also reduced following both treatments. Moreover, RIC modulated systemic inflammation. The level of chemokines CINC-1, LIX and RANTES decreased after 24 h of post-ischaemic reperfusion in treated animals compared to non-treated. The RIC-mediated decrease of inflammation was reflected in improved sedimentation rate and hematocrit, as well as reduced systemic oxidative stress. The results of this work showed neuroprotective and lung protective effects of RIC with a decrease in inflammation response. On the basis of our results, we assume that immunomodulation through the chemokines CINC-1, LIX, and RANTES play a role in RIC-mediated protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.