Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237636›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2024

Triple therapy boosts survival in NSCLC patients with brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study of chemotherapy, ICIs, and antiangiogenic agents.

Dingyi Yang, Erha Munai, Siwei Zeng, Dan Tao, Ze Yuan, Liang Du, Wei Zhou, Yongzhong Wu, Xiao-Dong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dingyi YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 71, He Di Road, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Erha MunaiSchool of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Siwei ZengSchool of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Dan TaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ze YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Liang DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Wei ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. zhouwei998@cqu.edu.cn.
Yongzhong WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. cqmdwyz@163.com.
Xiao-Dong ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 71, He Di Road, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. zhuxdonggxmu@126.com.

Funding

Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Project No. 2023GGXM002Chongqing Talent Plan No. CQYC20210203119Independent Project of Key Laboratory of Early Prevention & Treatment for Regional HighIncidence Tumor No. GKEZZ202230Key Research and Development Program Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region No. GuikeAB23026020National Natural Science Foundation Project No. 82073347National Natural Science Foundation Project No. 82303673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of brain metastases (BMs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially those with non-sensitive genetic mutations, is hindered by limited drug delivery through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This retrospective study explores the efficacy of systemic treatments during brain metastasis to radiotherapy evaluation window in improving patient survival.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 209 NSCLC patients with non-sensitive mutations and BMs, treated between 2016 and 2023 at two tertiary medical centers (Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital). The patients were divided into three groups, namely chemotherapy alone (C; n = 95), chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (C + I; n = 62), and chemotherapy with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy (A) (C + I + A; n = 52). Statistical analyses were performed using R software, version 4.3.3. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, and survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess factors associated with overall survival (OS). Bayesian model averaging (BMA) was employed to address model uncertainty and improve result robustness. Subgroup analyses evaluated treatment-related mortality risk.

resultsFrom an initial cohort of 658 NSCLC patients with BMs, 209 were analyzed with a median age of 59; the majority were male (80.9%) and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (78.9%). Univariate analysis identified significant variables influencing outcomes, including BMs radiotherapy EQD2, BMs count, local thoracic treatment, BMs radiotherapy field, intracranial response, and systemic treatment post-BMs diagnosis. The C + I + A regimen significantly improved median OS to 23.6 months compared to 11.4 months with C and 16.2 months with C + I, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43-0.82; P < 0.0001). The two-year OS rate was highest in the C + I + A group at 38.5%, versus 10.5% in C and 20.4% in C + I (P < 0.001). Cox regression and BMA analyses confirmed the stability of BMA in providing HR estimates, yielding area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.785 for BMA and 0.793 for the Cox model, with no significant difference in predictive performance. Subgroup analysis revealed a 71% mortality risk reduction with C + I + A (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.18-0.47; P < 0.0001), showing consistent benefits regardless of patient sex, BMs count, extracranial metastases presence, and local thoracic treatments. Treatment sequence analysis indicated a median OS of 33.4 months for patients starting with A, though not statistically significant (HR: 0.59; P = 0.36). The overall incidence of radiation-induced brain injury was low at 3.3%, with rates in the C, C + I, and C + I + A groups being 3.2%, 4.8%, and 1.9%, respectively (P = 0.683).

conclusionOur study demonstrates the significant benefit of the C + I + A combination therapy in improving OS and reducing mortality risk in NSCLC patients with non-sensitive gene-mutated BMs. The sequential administration of A followed by ICIs shows a promising synergistic effect with cranial radiotherapy, highlighting the potential for optimized treatment sequencing. These findings emphasize the efficacy of tailored combination therapies in complex oncological care and suggest that our approach could lead to meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes for this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBrain metastasisImmune-related combination therapyNon-sensitive genetic mutationsNon-small cell lung cancerPeri-brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39237636
PMCPMC11377371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.