Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An improved sand cat swarm optimization with lens opposition-based learning and sparrow search algorithm.

Yanguang Cai, Changle Guo, Xiang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanguang CaiSchool of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 511400, China.
Changle GuoSchool of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 511400, China. guochangle0212@163.com.
Xiang ChenSchool of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 511400, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province Province under grant No. 2016A050502060Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province Province under grant No. 2020B1010010005Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou No. 202206010011Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou No. 2023B03J1339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sand cat swarm optimization (SCSO) is a recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithm. It inspires hunting behavior with sand cats based on hearing ability. However, in the later stage of SCSO, it is easy to fall into local optimality and cannot find a better position. In order to improve the search ability of SCSO and avoid falling into local optimal, an improved algorithm is proposed - Improved sand cat swarm optimization based on lens opposition-based learning and sparrow search algorithm (LSSCSO). A dynamic spiral search is introduced in the exploitation stage to make the algorithm search for better positions in the search space and improve the convergence accuracy of the algorithm. The lens opposition-based learning and the sparrow search algorithm are introduced in the later stages of the algorithm to make the algorithm jump out of the local optimum and improve the global search capability of the algorithm. To verify the effectiveness of LSSCSO in solving global optimization problems, CEC2005 and CEC2022 test functions are used to test the optimization performance of LSSCSO in different dimensions. The data results, convergence curve and Wilcoxon rank sum test are analyzed, and the results show that it has a strong optimization ability and can reach the optimal in most cases. Finally, LSSCSO is used to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm in solving engineering optimization problems.

Indexed as

Engineering optimization problemsLens opposition-based learningSand cat swarm optimizationSparrow search algorithm

Identifiers

PMID39237632
PMCPMC11377783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.