ReviewLight, science & applications2024
Neural network-based processing and reconstruction of compromised biophotonic image data.
Review in Light, science & applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single capture quantitative oblique back-illumination microscopy.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- Flexible, stretchable, on-chip optical tweezers for high-throughput bioparticle manipulation.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Label-Free Optical Imaging Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Automated HER2 Scoring with Uncertainty Quantification Using Lensfree Holography and Deep Learning.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Article
- Bridging classical and neural methods for improved segmentation in mathematical text based images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nanoscale Imaging of Biological Tissues: Techniques, Challenges and Emerging Frontiers.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- BlurryScope enables compact, cost-effective scanning microscopy for HER2 scoring using deep learning on blurry images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the integration of deep learning techniques with biophotonic setups has opened new horizons in bioimaging. A compelling trend in this field involves deliberately compromising certain measurement metrics to engineer better bioimaging tools in terms of e.g., cost, speed, and form-factor, followed by compensating for the resulting defects through the utilization of deep learning models trained on a large amount of ideal, superior or alternative data. This strategic approach has found increasing popularity due to its potential to enhance various aspects of biophotonic imaging. One of the primary motivations for employing this strategy is the pursuit of higher temporal resolution or increased imaging speed, critical for capturing fine dynamic biological processes. Additionally, this approach offers the prospect of simplifying hardware requirements and complexities, thereby making advanced imaging standards more accessible in terms of cost and/or size. This article provides an in-depth review of the diverse measurement aspects that researchers intentionally impair in their biophotonic setups, including the point spread function (PSF), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sampling density, and pixel resolution. By deliberately compromising these metrics, researchers aim to not only recuperate them through the application of deep learning networks, but also bolster in return other crucial parameters, such as the field of view (FOV), depth of field (DOF), and space-bandwidth product (SBP). Throughout this article, we discuss various biophotonic methods that have successfully employed this strategic approach. These techniques span a wide range of applications and showcase the versatility and effectiveness of deep learning in the context of compromised biophotonic data. Finally, by offering our perspectives on the exciting future possibilities of this rapidly evolving concept, we hope to motivate our readers from various disciplines to explore novel ways of balancing hardware compromises with compensation via artificial intelligence (AI).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.