Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237557›Full record

ReviewNPJ breast cancer2024

BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs?

Peter Dubsky, Christian Jackisch, Seock-Ah Im, Kelly K Hunt, Chien-Feng Li, Sheila Unger, Shani Paluch-Shimon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Multigene panel testing reveals the spectrum of non-BRCA germline variants in BRCA1/2-negative breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer patients from a Turkish cohort.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mainstreaming genetic testing in community oncology settings.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Navigating the healthcare system with aGynecologic oncology reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  13. Clinical predictors ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter DubskyBreast and Tumor Center, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland. peter.dubsky@hirslanden.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-0209
Christian JackischDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Center, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-3743
Seock-Ah ImSeoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kelly K HuntMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-8723
Chien-Feng LiNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sheila UngerGenetica, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Shani Paluch-ShimonHadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that have been linked to inherited susceptibility of breast cancer. Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (gBRCAm) are clinically relevant for treatment selection in breast cancer because they confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. BRCA1/2 mutation status may also impact decisions on other systemic therapies, risk-reducing measures, and choice of surgery. Consequently, demand for gBRCAm testing has increased. Several barriers to genetic testing exist, including limited access to testing facilities, trained counselors, and psychosocial support, as well as the financial burden of testing. Here, we describe current implications of gBRCAm testing for patients with breast cancer, summarize current approaches to gBRCAm testing, provide potential solutions to support wider adoption of mainstreaming testing practices, and consider future directions of testing.

Identifiers

PMID39237557
PMCPMC11377442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.