Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237547›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Automatic ploidy prediction and quality assessment of human blastocysts using time-lapse imaging.

Suraj Rajendran, Matthew Brendel, Josue Barnes, Qiansheng Zhan, Jonas E Malmsten, Pantelis Zisimopoulos, Alexandros Sigaras, Kwabena Ofori-Atta, Marcos Meseguer, Kathleen A Miller and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Noninvasive Biomarkers of Human Embryo Developmental Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Suraj RajendranInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8149-0157
Matthew BrendelInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3417-4597
Josue BarnesInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Qiansheng ZhanThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7130-7606
Jonas E MalmstenThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6740-6548
Pantelis ZisimopoulosInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2425-0882
Alexandros SigarasInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-559X
Kwabena Ofori-AttaWeill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
Marcos MeseguerIVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Kathleen A MillerIVF Florida Reproductive Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0352-470X
David HoffmanIVF Florida Reproductive Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Zev RosenwaksThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Olivier ElementoInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-9617
Nikica ZaninovicThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Iman HajirasoulihaInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. imh2003@med.cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-3371

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering MST ProgramT32GM007739 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HSU, KATHARINE C · 1985 to 2023
$51.1M
Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering MST ProgramT32GM152349 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KATHARINE C HSU · 2024 to 2026
$6.6M
Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology & MedicineT32GM083937 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHRISTINI, DAVID J. · 2009 to 2018
$3.1M
Improving Metagenomic Analysis with Novel Algorithms and TechnologiesR35GM138152 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Iman Hajirasouliha · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138152NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007739NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM083937NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152349U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM138152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing fertilized human embryos is crucial for in vitro fertilization, a task being revolutionized by artificial intelligence. Existing models used for embryo quality assessment and ploidy detection could be significantly improved by effectively utilizing time-lapse imaging to identify critical developmental time points for maximizing prediction accuracy. Addressing this, we develop and compare various embryo ploidy status prediction models across distinct embryo development stages. We present BELA, a state-of-the-art ploidy prediction model that surpasses previous image- and video-based models without necessitating input from embryologists. BELA uses multitask learning to predict quality scores that are thereafter used to predict ploidy status. By achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 for discriminating between euploidy and aneuploidy embryos on the Weill Cornell dataset, BELA matches the performance of models trained on embryologists' manual scores. While not a replacement for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, BELA exemplifies how such models can streamline the embryo evaluation process.

Indexed as

AneuploidyBlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentPloidiesTime-Lapse ImagingFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39237547
PMCPMC11377764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.