Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237496›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2024

Thresholdless coherence in a superradiant laser.

Seung-Hoon Oh, Jinuk Kim, Junseo Ha, Gibeom Son, Kyungwon An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seung-Hoon OhDepartment of Physics and Astronomy & Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jinuk KimKorea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Korea.
Junseo HaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy & Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Gibeom SonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy & Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyungwon AnDepartment of Physics and Astronomy & Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. kwan@phya.snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-6297

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2020R1A2C3009299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lasing threshold in the conventional lasers is the minimum input power required to initiate laser oscillation. It has been widely accepted that the conventional laser threshold occurring around a unity intracavity photon number can be eliminated in the input-output curve by making the so-called β parameter approach unity. The recent experiments, however, have revealed that even in this case the photon statistics still undergo a transition from coherent to thermal statistics when the intracavity mean photon number is decreased below unity. Since the coherent output is only available above the diminished threshold, the long-sought promise of thresholdless lasers to produce always coherent light has become questionable. Here, we present an always-coherent thresholdless laser based on superradiance by two-level atoms in a quantum superposition state with the same phase traversing a high-Q cavity. Superradiant lasing was observed without the conventional lasing threshold around the unity photon number and the photon statistics remained near coherent even below it. The coherence was improved by reducing the coupling constant as well as the excited-state amplitude in the superposition state. Our results pave a way toward always-coherent thresholdless lasers with more practical media such as quantum dots, nitrogen-vacancy centers and doped ions in crystals.

Identifiers

PMID39237496
PMCPMC11377561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.