Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237350›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Digitalised primary care in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of minoritised ethnic communities.

Farjana Islam, Sara Bailey, Gina Netto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring the lived experience for the most vulnerable.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farjana IslamThe Urban Institute, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-8469
Sara BaileyInstitute of Educational Technology, the Open University.ORCID 0009-0006-8993-3852
Gina NettoThe Urban Institute, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7552-5683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarriers to accessing and using primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities have been extensively evidenced in the UK. However, the impact of the rapid digitalisation of these services on these communities remains under-researched.

aimTo explore the impact of digitalisation on access to and use of primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities. DESIGN AND

settingUnderpinned by a critical realist intersectional approach, and employing qualitative research methods, this study explores minoritised ethnic individuals' experiences of digital primary care in the UK.

methodIn total, 100 minoritised ethnic adults who identify as Black African, Black Caribbean, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, and of mixed or multiple ethnic heritage in four sites in the UK were purposively recruited and interviewed. Interviews were thematically analysed to increase understanding of how individuals' ethnicity intersects with other characteristics (for example, language, age, gender, socioeconomic status) to identify constraints and enablements to accessing health care.

resultsMinoritised ethnic individuals' access to digital primary care is impeded by factors such as digital precarity (for example, inadequate devices, internet connectivity, and digital literacy skills), a lack of language support, and staff shortcomings in responding to ethnically diverse populations. Intergenerational support and bespoke offerings by general practices in some areas enable some individuals to overcome some of the constraints.

conclusionThe rapid digitalisation of primary care services is replicating and potentially exacerbating barriers to using these services among minoritised ethnic communities, a finding that merits urgent attention by practitioners and policymakers.

Indexed as

Ethnic and Racial MinoritiesHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdomdigital access to health caredigitalisation of primary careethnic and racial minoritiesintersectionalityminoritised ethnicprimary health carequalitative researchracialised barriers

Identifiers

PMID39237350
PMCPMC11539925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.