Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237280›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture and adverse events in Hail City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional approach to improving healthcare safety.

Awatif M Alrasheeday, Sameer A Alkubati, Talal Ali Hussein Alqalah, Gamil Ghaleb Alrubaiee, Eddieson Pasay-An, Bushra Alshammari, Saleh O Abdullah, Ahmed Loutfy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Awatif M AlrasheedayNursing Administration Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Sameer A AlkubatiMedical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia alkubatisa@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8538-5250
Talal Ali Hussein AlqalahMedical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Gamil Ghaleb AlrubaieeDepartment of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Eddieson Pasay-AnNursing Administration Department, College of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Bushra AlshammariMedical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9631-8870
Saleh O AbdullahDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hodeida University, Hodeida, Yemen.
Ahmed LoutfyMaternal and Child Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture (PSC) and its relationship with adverse events in Hail City, Saudi Arabia.

designA cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 August 2023 and the end of November 2023 at 4 governmental hospitals and 28 primary healthcare centres.

settingHail City, Saudi Arabia.

participantsData were collected from 336 nurses using 3 instruments: demographic and work-related questions, PSC and adverse events.

resultsNurses had positive responses in the dimensions of 'teamwork within units' (76.86%) and 'frequency of events reported' (77.87%) but negative responses in the dimensions of 'handoffs and transitions' (18.75%), 'staffing' (20.90%), 'non-punitive response to errors' (31.83%), 'teamwork across units' (34.15%), 'supervisor/manager expectations' (43.22%) and 'overall perception of patient safety' (43.23%). Significant associations were found between nationality, experience, current position and total safety culture, with p values of 0.015, 0.046 and 0.027, respectively. Nurses with high-ranking perceptions of PSC in 'handoffs and transitions,' 'staffing' and 'teamwork across hospital units' reported a lower incidence of adverse events than those with low-ranking perceptions, particularly in reporting pressure ulcers (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.94 and OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99, respectively) (p<0.05). Nurses with high-ranking perceptions of PSC in UK 'handoffs and transitions' reported a lower incidence of patient falls. Similarly, those with high-ranking perceptions in both 'handoffs and transitions' and 'overall perception of patient safety reported a lower incidence of adverse events compared with those with low-ranking perceptions, especially in reporting adverse drug events (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.91 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92, respectively) (p<0.05).

conclusionFrom a nursing perspective, hospital PSCs have both strengths and weaknesses. Examples include low trust in leadership, staffing, error-reporting and handoffs. Therefore, to improve staffing, communication, handoffs, teamwork, and leadership, interventions should focus on weak areas of low confidence and high rates of adverse events.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient SafetySafety ManagementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedical ErrorsNursesNursing Staff, HospitalOrganizational CulturePerceptionQuality ImprovementSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesNursesPatientsSafety

Identifiers

PMID39237280
PMCPMC11381649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.