Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237205›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2024

CAPRI-Q: The CAPRI resource evaluating the quality of predicted structures of protein complexes.

Keeley W Collins, Matthew M Copeland, Guillaume Brysbaert, Shoshana J Wodak, Alexandre M J J Bonvin, Petras J Kundrotas, Ilya A Vakser, Marc F Lensink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular dockingDigital discovery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. AI-Driven De Novo Binder Design: From Structure Prediction to Closed-Loop Optimization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mapping the interaction surface between CaNature communications · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keeley W CollinsComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Matthew M CopelandComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Guillaume BrysbaertUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, F-59000 Lille, France.
Shoshana J WodakVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandre M J J BonvinBijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Petras J KundrotasComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. Electronic address: pkundro@ku.edu.
Ilya A VakserComputational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. Electronic address: vakser@ku.edu.
Marc F LensinkUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, F-59000 Lille, France. Electronic address: marc.lensink@univ-lille.fr.

Funding

Integrated Resource for Protein Recognition StudiesR01GM074255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI VAKSER, ILYA · 2005 to 2024
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074255NSF DBI 2224122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein interactions are essential for cellular processes. In recent years there has been significant progress in computational prediction of 3D structures of individual protein chains, with the best-performing algorithms reaching sub-Ångström accuracy. These techniques are now finding their way into the prediction of protein interactions, adding to the existing modeling approaches. The community-wide Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions (CAPRI) has been a catalyst for the development of procedures for the structural modeling of protein assemblies by organizing blind prediction experiments. The predicted structures are assessed against unpublished experimentally determined structures using a set of metrics with proven robustness that have been established in the CAPRI community. In addition, several advanced benchmarking databases provide targets against which users can test docking and assembly modeling software. These include the Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark, the CAPRI Scoreset, and the Dockground database, all developed by members of the CAPRI community. Here we present CAPRI-Q, a stand-alone model quality assessment tool, which can be freely downloaded or used via a publicly available web server. This tool applies the CAPRI metrics to assess the quality of query structures against given target structures, along with other popular quality metrics such as DockQ, TM-score and l-DDT, and classifies the models according to the CAPRI model quality criteria. The tool can handle a variety of protein complex types including those involving peptides, nucleic acids, and oligosaccharides. The source code is freely available from https://gitlab.in2p3.fr/cmsb-public/CAPRI-Q and its web interface through the Dockground resource at https://dockground.compbio.ku.edu/assessment/.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProteinsblind predictionCAPRIprotein dockingprotein modelingquality assessment

Identifiers

PMID39237205
PMCPMC11458157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.