ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2025
Lack of classical astroblastoma features in pediatric MN1::BEND2-fused brain tumors.
Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lack of classical astroblastoma features in pediatric MN1::BEND2-fused brain tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three distinct MN1::BEND2 fusion-positive tumors in pediatric patients. (A) Clinical course for each patient was variable in part due to differences in initial diagnosis. Each patient responded favorably to gross total resection and is stable at last follow-up. (B) Histologic diversity, lack of prominent classical astroblastoma features, and variable immunoexpression of key markers makes microscopic diagnosis challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.