Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39237028›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2024

Machine Learning for Targeted Advance Care Planning in Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Study.

Mihir N Patel, Alexandria Mara, Yvonne Acker, Jamie Gollon, Noppon Setji, Jonathan Walter, Steven Wolf, S Yousuf Zafar, Suresh Balu, Michael Gao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mihir N PatelDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Alexandria MaraAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Concord, North Carolina.
Yvonne AckerPatient Safety and Quality, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Jamie GollonBusiness Transformation, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Noppon SetjiDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jonathan WalterDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Steven WolfDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
S Yousuf ZafarDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Suresh BaluDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael GaoDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, North Carolina.
Mark SendakDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, North Carolina.
David CasarettDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Thomas W LeBlancDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jessica MaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health System, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: jessica.ma@duke.edu.

Funding

University of Michigan (UM) HEAL Initiative National K12 Clinical Pain Career Development Program (UM-HCPDP)K12NS130673 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Daniel J Clauw, Steven Edward Harte · 2022 to 2026
$12.5M
Integrated Biostatistical Training for CVD ResearchT32HL079896 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sean M O'Brien, Ana-Maria Staicu · 2006 to 2026
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079896NIDDK NIH HHS L30 DK140987NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS130673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPrognostication challenges contribute to delays in advance care planning (ACP) for patients with cancer near the end of life (EOL).

objectivesExamine a quality improvement mortality prediction algorithm intervention's impact on ACP documentation and EOL care.

methodsWe implemented a validated mortality risk prediction machine learning model for solid malignancy patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) to a dedicated solid malignancy unit at Duke University Hospital. Clinicians received an email when a patient was identified as high-risk. We compared ACP documentation and EOL care outcomes before and after the notification intervention. We excluded patients with intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the first 24 hours. Comparisons involved chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests; comparisons stratified by physician specialty employ Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.

resultsPreintervention and postintervention cohorts comprised 88 and 77 patients, respectively. Most were White, non-Hispanic/Latino, and married. ACP conversations were documented for 2.3% of hospitalizations preintervention vs. 80.5% postintervention (P<0.001), and if the attending physician notified was a palliative care specialist (4.1% vs. 84.6%) or oncologist (0% vs. 76.3%) (P<0.001). There were no differences between groups in length of stay (LOS), hospice referral, code status change, ICU admissions or LOS, 30-day readmissions, 30-day ED visits, and inpatient and 30-day deaths.

conclusionIdentifying patients with cancer and high mortality risk via machine learning elicited a substantial increase in documented ACP conversations but did not impact EOL care. Our intervention showed promise in changing clinician behavior. Further integration of this model in clinical practice is ongoing.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningMachine LearningNeoplasmsQuality ImprovementTerminal CareAgedAlgorithmsDocumentationEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdvance care planningcancerend-of-lifemachine learningquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39237028
PMCPMC11536198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.