ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024
Linked-evidence modelling of qualitative G6PD testing to inform low- and intermediate-dose primaquine treatment for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical cure of Plasmodium vivax infections is key to the control of vivax malaria. However, the standard doses of 8-aminoquinoline drugs used for radical cure can cause severe haemolysis in G6PD-deficient patients. The availability of near-patient G6PD tests could increase use of primaquine (PQ), however direct evidence of the impacts that G6PD testing has on downstream patient outcomes, such as haemolysis and recurrence is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE
findingsA linked-evidence model was created to investigate changes in the number of severe haemolysis events and P. vivax recurrences within 6 months of treatment when qualitative G6PD testing was used to guide PQ treatment (0.25mg/kg/day for 14 days and 0.5mg/kg/day for 7 days), compared to prescribing 14-day PQ with no G6PD testing. In the model patients identified as G6PD-deficient received 8-week PQ (0.75mg/kg/week). The model was used to simulate scenarios with 1%, 5% and 10% prevalence of G6PD-deficiency (G6PDd) in theoretical populations of 10,000 male and female P. vivax patients and initially assumed 100% adherence to the prescribed PQ regiment. Results illustrate that G6PD testing to guide the 14-day PQ regiment reduced severe haemolysis by 21-80% and increased recurrences by 3-6%, compared to applying the 14-day PQ regiment without G6PD testing. Results for the 7-day PQ regiment informed by G6PD testing were mixed, dependent on G6PDd prevalence and sex. When adherence to the PQ regiments was less than perfect the model predicted reductions in the number of recurrences at all prevalence levels, provided adherence to 7-day PQ was 5-10% higher than adherence to the 14-day regiment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Introduction of G6PD testing to guide PQ treatment reduces severe haemolysis events for the 14-day regiment, and the 7-day regiment in higher G6PDd prevalence settings, compared to use of 14-day PQ without G6PD testing when all patients adhere to the prescribed PQ treatment. At a population level, there were increases in recurrences, but this could be resolved when the 7-day regiment was used and had superior adherence compared to the 14-day regiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.