ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Optimizing COVID-19 testing resources use with wearable sensors.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The timely identification of infectious pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic cases is key towards preventing the spread of a viral illness like COVID-19. Early identification has been done through routine testing programs, which are indeed costly and potentially burdensome for individuals who should be tested with high frequency. A supplemental tool is represented by wearable technology, that can passively monitor and identify individuals at high risk, alerting them to take a test. We designed a Markov chain model and simulated a routine testing and a wearable testing strategy to estimate the number of tests required and the average number of days in which an individual is infectious and undetected. According to our model, with 2 test per month available, we have that the number of infectious and undetected days is 4.1 in the case of routine testing, while it decreases by 46% and 27% with a wearable testing strategy in the presence or absence of self-reported symptoms. The proposed parametric model can be used for different viral illnesses by tuning its parameters. It shows that wearable technology informing a testing strategy can significantly reduce the number of infectious days in which an individuals can spread the virus. With the same number of infectious days, by using wearables we can potentially reduce the number of required tests and the cost of the testing strategy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.