Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235953›Full record

SynthesisExperimental physiology2026

Cross-education of lower limb muscle strength following resistance exercise training in males and females: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdulmajeed Altheyab, Helal Alqurashi, Timothy J England, Bethan E Phillips, Mathew Piasecki

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Effects of the Modified LiiNKInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdulmajeed AltheyabCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-4321
Helal AlqurashiCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Timothy J EnglandStroke Trials Unit, Academic Unit of Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Bethan E PhillipsCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Mathew PiaseckiCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-4631

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research MR/X005240/1Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-education describes the training of one limb that leads to performance enhancements in the contralateral untrained limb, driven by neural changes rather than muscle adaptation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cross-education (vs. a control group) via resistance exercise training (RET) for improving muscle strength in the untrained lower limb of healthy males and females. A literature search from inception to September 2023 was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Web of Science (Core Database), Scopus, EBSCO-host, and Ovid-EMBASE. Independent screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted. The measured outcomes were change in one-repetition maximum (1-RM) load, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and concentric, eccentric and isometric peak torque. Change in muscle structure (pennation angle and muscle thickness) was also analysed. A total of 29 studies were included. The pooled effect size from the random-effects model shows that cross-education significantly increased 1-RM compared to the control group (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22-0.97; P = 0.002). Cross-education also significantly improved MVC (SMD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.16-0.94; P = 0.006), concentric (SMD: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.84; P < 0.00001), eccentric (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-0.64; P = 0.003) and isometric (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26-0.64; P < 0.00001) peak torque, each compared to the control group. When RET was categorised as eccentric or concentric, subgroup analysis showed that only eccentric training was associated with significantly increased isometric peak torque via cross-education (SMD: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.13-0.61; P = 0.003) (concentric, SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.74; P = 0.12). This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasise the potency of cross-education for improving lower limb muscle strength. These findings have potential implications for clinical situations of impaired unilateral limb function (e.g., limb-casting or stroke). Future work exploring the mechanisms facilitating these enhancements will help to develop optimised rehabilitation protocols.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingFemaleHumansMaleMuscle Contractioncross‐educationcross‐transferlower limbmuscle strengthstrength training

Identifiers

PMID39235953
PMCPMC13238690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.