Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235819›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2024

Lynch Syndrome and Somatic Mismatch Repair Variants in Pancreas Cancer.

Catherine A O'Connor, Emily Harrold, David Lin, Henry Walch, Andrea Gazzo, Megha Ranganathan, Sarah Kane, Fergus Keane, Joshua Schoenfeld, Drew Moss and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Improving outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Catherine A O'ConnorDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Emily HarroldDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David LinKravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York.
Henry WalchKravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York.
Andrea GazzoDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Megha RanganathanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sarah KaneDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Fergus KeaneDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joshua SchoenfeldDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Drew MossMount Sinai Morningside West, New York, New York.
Deborah M Thurtle-SchmidtDepartment of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina.
Sarah P SuehnholzHuman Oncology Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York.
Debyani ChakravartyHuman Oncology Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York.
Fiyinfolu BalogunDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anna VargheseDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kenneth YuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David KelsenDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alicia LathamDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Britta WeigeltDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wungki ParkDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zsofia StadlerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Eileen M O'ReillyDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA257881-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Microsatellite (MS) instability (MSI-H) occurs frequently in Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated tumors and is associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. MSI-H is conferred by germline or somatic variants in mismatch repair genes. The contribution of somatic oncogenesis to MSI-H in pancreatic cancer (PC) is unknown. Objective: To evaluate an LS-related PC cohort to define clinicogenomic features, describe somatic MSI-H cases (germline negative), characterize response to ICB, and guide preferred MS testing methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-institution, retrospective analysis was conducted from March 2012 to July 2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and included 55 patients with PC and either an LS germline pathogenic variant (gPV) or somatic mismatch repair (MMR) variant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite MMR and MS status determined using orthogonal methods. An artificial intelligence classifier was used to account for low-cellularity specimens. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical record. Zygosity status and somatic comutation landscape analyzed. Results: Fifty-five patients (23 women [42%]) had PC and an MMR variant: 32 (58%) had LS (LS cohort) and 23 (42%) had a somatic MMR variant (no germline pathogenic variant, somatic MMR cohort). In the LS cohort, 10 (31%) had gMSH2, 9 (28%) gMSH6, 8 (25%) gPMS2, 4 (13%) gMLH1, 1 (3%) gEPCAM. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 45-88 years). For composite MS status, 17 (59%) were MSI-H, 12 (41%) MS stable, and 3 MS unknown. Five cases were reclassified as MSI-H by the artificial intelligence classifier. In the somatic MMR cohort, 11 (48%) had MSH6, 7 (30%) MLH1, 3 (13%) MSH2, and 2 (9%) PMS2. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 66-85 years). For composite MS status, 10 (43%) were MSI-H, 11 (48%) MS stable, and 2 (9%) MS indeterminate. Six cases were reclassified as MSI-H by the artificial intelligence classifier. For the LS and somatic MMR cohorts, 20 received ICB (n = 17 MSI-H). The median ICB duration was 27.7 months (95% CI, 11.5 to not reached); the disease control rate was 80%. Conclusion: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that MSI-H occurs due to LS or somatic oncogenesis in PC. Orthogonal MS testing is key in PC; the artificial intelligence classifier reclassified approximately 20% of cases, most of which were low cellularity. ICB for patients with LS or somatic MSI-H PC provided significant benefit.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairMicrosatellite InstabilityPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39235819
PMCPMC11378065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.