Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235817›Full record

Observational studyJAMA ophthalmology2024

Proximal Location of Optic Disc Hemorrhage and Glaucoma Progression.

Young In Shin, Jaekyoung Lee, Yoon Jeong, Min Gu Huh, Ki Ho Park, Jin Wook Jeoung

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young In ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Jaekyoung LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon JeongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Gu HuhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Ki Ho ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Wook JeoungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although optic disc hemorrhage (DH) is widely recognized as a glaucoma risk factor, its clinical relevance in relation to proximity has not been investigated. Objective: To determine the association of the proximal location of DH with glaucoma progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal observational cohort study, 146 eyes of 146 patients at Seoul National University Hospital who had had 1 or more DH with at least 5 years of follow-up and had at least 5 reliable visual field examinations were included. These data were analyzed January 10, 2010, through June 27, 2017. Exposures: Laminar, marginal, rim, and parapapillary subtypes of DH were identified based on their respective proximal locations. The laminar and marginal subtypes were classified into the cup-type group, while the rim and parapapillary subtypes were classified into the peripapillary-type group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival experiences and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model to identify risk factors for glaucoma progression. Regression analyses, both univariate and multivariate, were used to discover significant indicators of mean deviation (MD) loss. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was glaucoma progression. Glaucoma progression was defined either as structural or functional deterioration. Results: For all of the eyes, the mean follow-up period was 10.9 (3.7) years (range, 5.1-17.8 years), the mean age at which DH was first detected was 55.1 (11.3) years (range, 21-77 years), and 94 participants were female (64.1%). Over the mean follow-up period of 10.9 years, glaucoma progression was detected in 94 eyes (61.4%) with an MD change of -0.48 dB per year. The cup-type group showed a faster rate of MD change relative to the peripapillary-type group (-0.56 vs -0.32 dB per year; difference = -0.24; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.11; P = .01). The cup group showed a higher cumulative probability of progression of glaucoma (80.4%) relative to the peripapillary group (54.4%; difference = 26.0%; 95% CI, 11.4%-40.6%; P < .001) in a life table analysis. The presence of cup hemorrhage was associated with an increased risk of glaucoma progression (hazard ratio, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.12-5.07; P < .001) in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Cup-type DH was associated to MD loss rate in regression analysis. Conclusions And Relevance: This study showed glaucoma progression was higher in cases of DH classified as the cup type. These findings support the potential utility of assessing the proximal location of DH to predict how glaucoma might progress.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionIntraocular PressureOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal HemorrhageVisual FieldsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39235817
PMCPMC11378069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.