Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
The LUTADOSE trial: tumour dosimetry after the first administration predicts progression free survival in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) patients treated with [
Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Survival and Its Relation to Tumor Absorbed Dose in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Dosimetry-Driven Personalization of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Evidence and Opportunities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Review
- Krenning score enhances integrated biomarker models for survival prediction in PRRT-treated GEP-NET: a retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Dosimetry inJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Personalised Dosimetry in Nuclear Medicine: Bridging Physics, Biology and AI for Next Generation Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Investigation of MicroRNAs as predictors of radioligand therapy response in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- The molecular blueprint of targeted radionuclide therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Toward the standardization of radiopharmaceutical therapies: a technical note evaluating a clinical dosimetry workflow for single-time-pointEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose-Effect Relationships in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted radionuclide therapy and diagnostic imaging of SSTR positive neuroendocrine tumors: a clinical update in the new decade.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling in radiopharmaceutical therapy: a review.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Evolution of dosimetric parameters through PRRT and potential impact on clinical practice: data from the prospective phase II LUMEN study.EJNMMI research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with [
methodsThe analysis was conducted on 42 patients administered 4 times, and on 165 lesions. Dosimetry was performed after the first and the forth cycle, with two SPECT/CT scans at day 1 and 7 after administration. Global mean Tumour absorbed Dose of each patient (GTD) was calculated after cycle 1 and 4 as the sum of lesion doses weighted by lesion mass, normalized by the global tumour mass. Cumulative GTD_TOT was calculated as the mean between cycle 1 (GTD_1) and 4 (GTD_4) multiplied by 4. Patients were followed-up for median 32.8 (range 18-45.5) months, through blood tests and contrast enhanced CT (ceCT). This study assessed the correlation between global tumour dose (GTD) and PFS longer or shorter than 24 months. After a ROC analysis, we stratified patients according to the best cut-off value for two additional statistical analyses. At last a multivariate analysis was carried out for PFS > / < 24 months.
resultsThe median follow-up interval was 33 months, ranging from 18 to 45.5 months. The median PFS was 42 months. The progression free survival rate at 20 months was 90.5%. GTD_1 and GTD_TOT were statistically associated with PFS > / < 24 m (p = 0.026 and p = 0.03 respectively). The stratification of patients on GTD_1 lower or higher than the best cut-off value at 10.6 Gy provided significantly different median PFS of 21 months versus non reached, i.e. longer than 45.5 months (p = 0.004), with a hazard ratio of 8.6, (95% C.I.: [2 - 37]). Using GTD_TOT with the best cut-off at 43 Gy, the same PFS values were obtained as after cycle 1 (p = 0.035). At multivariate analysis, a decrease in GTD_1 and, with lower impact, a higher global tumour volume were significantly associated with PFS < 24 months. We calculated the Tumour Control Probability of obtaining PFS > 24 months as a function of GTD_1. DISCUSSION: Several statistical analyses seem to confirm that simple tumour dosimetry with 2 SPECT/CT scans after the first administration allows to predict PFS values after 4 × 7.4 GBq administrations of
conclusionTumour dosimetry after the first administration of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
39235614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.