Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235614›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

The LUTADOSE trial: tumour dosimetry after the first administration predicts progression free survival in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) patients treated with [

Marco Maccauro, Mariarosaria Cuomo, Matteo Bauckneht, Matteo Bagnalasta, Stefania Mazzaglia, Federica Scalorbi, Giovanni Argiroffi, Margarita Kirienko, Alice Lorenzoni, Gianluca Aliberti and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient Survival and Its Relation to Tumor Absorbed Dose in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Dosimetry-Driven Personalization of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Evidence and Opportunities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Krenning score enhances integrated biomarker models for survival prediction in PRRT-treated GEP-NET: a retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Dosimetry inJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The molecular blueprint of targeted radionuclide therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose-Effect Relationships in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marco MaccauroNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-3250
Mariarosaria CuomoNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BaucknehtNuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-9116
Matteo BagnalastaNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-3566-5179
Stefania MazzagliaNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Federica ScalorbiNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2311-1067
Giovanni ArgiroffiNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Margarita KirienkoNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-1151
Alice LorenzoniNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca AlibertiNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Sara PuscedduMedical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Calareso GiuseppinaRadiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Enrico Matteo GaranziniRadiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ettore SeregniNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Carlo ChiesaNuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. Carlo.chiesa@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0634-013X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with [

methodsThe analysis was conducted on 42 patients administered 4 times, and on 165 lesions. Dosimetry was performed after the first and the forth cycle, with two SPECT/CT scans at day 1 and 7 after administration. Global mean Tumour absorbed Dose of each patient (GTD) was calculated after cycle 1 and 4 as the sum of lesion doses weighted by lesion mass, normalized by the global tumour mass. Cumulative GTD_TOT was calculated as the mean between cycle 1 (GTD_1) and 4 (GTD_4) multiplied by 4. Patients were followed-up for median 32.8 (range 18-45.5) months, through blood tests and contrast enhanced CT (ceCT). This study assessed the correlation between global tumour dose (GTD) and PFS longer or shorter than 24 months. After a ROC analysis, we stratified patients according to the best cut-off value for two additional statistical analyses. At last a multivariate analysis was carried out for PFS > / < 24 months.

resultsThe median follow-up interval was 33 months, ranging from 18 to 45.5 months. The median PFS was 42 months. The progression free survival rate at 20 months was 90.5%. GTD_1 and GTD_TOT were statistically associated with PFS > / < 24 m (p = 0.026 and p = 0.03 respectively). The stratification of patients on GTD_1 lower or higher than the best cut-off value at 10.6 Gy provided significantly different median PFS of 21 months versus non reached, i.e. longer than 45.5 months (p = 0.004), with a hazard ratio of 8.6, (95% C.I.: [2 - 37]). Using GTD_TOT with the best cut-off at 43 Gy, the same PFS values were obtained as after cycle 1 (p = 0.035). At multivariate analysis, a decrease in GTD_1 and, with lower impact, a higher global tumour volume were significantly associated with PFS < 24 months. We calculated the Tumour Control Probability of obtaining PFS > 24 months as a function of GTD_1. DISCUSSION: Several statistical analyses seem to confirm that simple tumour dosimetry with 2 SPECT/CT scans after the first administration allows to predict PFS values after 4 × 7.4 GBq administrations of

conclusionTumour dosimetry after the first administration of [

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsPancreatic NeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalRadiometryStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studieslutetium Lu 177 dotatateOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsDosimetryNeuroendocrine tumoursProgression-free survivalPRRT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.