ArticleScience China. Life sciences2024
Novel DNA methylation markers for early detection of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in female patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Targeting intratumoral Streptococcus mitis suppresses the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive metabolic profiling uncovers early variation and biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding epigenetic and transcriptional landscapes: DNA methylome-transcriptome integration reveals novel drivers in 4NQO-Induced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma mouse model.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Fecal metabolites as early-phase biomarkers and prediction panel for ischemic stroke.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Construction of a multigenic diagnostic, prognostic, and immune infiltration model with methylation-associated regulators in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) present significant health challenges in China, often diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognoses. However, effective biomarkers for early detection remain elusive. This study aimed to integrate methylome and transcriptome data to identify DNA methylation markers for the early detection of GCA and ESCC. In the discovery stage, we conducted Infinium MethylationEPIC array analysis on 36 paired GCA and non-tumor adjacent tissues (NAT), identifying differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCs) between GCA/ESCC and NAT through combined analyses of in-house and publicly available data. In the validation stage, targeted pyrosequencing and quantitative real-time RT-PCR were performed on paired tumor and NAT samples from 50 GCA and 50 ESCC patients. In the application stage, an independent set of 438 samples, including GCA, ESCC, high- and low-grade dysplasia (HGD/LGD), and normal controls, was tested for selected DMCs using pyrosequencing. Our analysis validated three GCA-specific, two ESCC-specific, and one tumor-shared DMCs, exhibiting significant hypermethylation and decreased expression of target genes in tumor samples compared with NAT. Leveraging these DMCs, we developed a GCA-specific 4-marker panel (cg27284428, cg11798358, cg07880787, and cg00585116) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.917, effectively distinguishing between cardia HGD/GCA patients and cardia LGD/normal controls. Similarly, an ESCC-specific 3-marker panel (cg14633892, cg04415798, and cg00585116) achieved an AUC of 0.865 in distinguishing esophageal HGD/ESCC cases. Furthermore, integrating cg00585116, age, and alcohol consumption yielded a tumor-shared logistic model with good discrimination for two cancer/HGD (AUC, 0.767; 95% confidence interval, 0.720-0.813). The mean AUC of the model after 5-fold cross-validation was 0.764. In summary, our study identifies novel DNA methylation markers capable of accurately distinguishing GCA/ESCC and HGD from LGD and normal controls. These findings offer promising prospects for targeted DNA methylation assays in future minimally invasive cancer screening methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39235559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.