Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235543›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2025

Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cancer Prevention Behaviors among LGBTQI + Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sanjana K Rana, Rebecca B Perkins, Devan Carr, Sarah Feldman, Kelly Welch, Eileen Duffey-Lind, Alessandro Villa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanjana K RanaTeam Maureen, North Falmouth, MA, USA.
Rebecca B PerkinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian and Avdesian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Devan CarrCommunity Benefits Office, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah FeldmanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kelly WelchTeam Maureen, North Falmouth, MA, USA.
Eileen Duffey-LindTeam Maureen, North Falmouth, MA, USA.
Alessandro VillaOral Medicine, Oral Oncology and Dentistry, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 North Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, USA. Alessandro.Villa@baptisthealth.net.ORCID 0000-0002-1966-6000

Funding

Regional Medical Libraries for the Network of the National Library of Medicine: Region 7 & NPHCOUG4LM012347 · NLM · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Mary Elizabeth Piorun · 2016 to 2026
$22.3M
NLM NIH HHS UG4LM012347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical cancer screening rates are suboptimal in the US, particularly among historically underserved groups like Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex (LGBTQI+)-identifying women and transgender men. Therefore, our cross-sectional study assessed factors associated with these rates among LGBTQI+-identifying women and transgender men.HPV-related cancer knowledge, HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening status, and the acceptability of self-collection for screening of 1983 LGBTQI+-identifying women and transgender men was assessed via an online survey available to members of the HER mobile app from March to May 2022. Associations between sociodemographic factors, vaccination, and screening were assessed using multivariable logistic regressions from November 2022 to December 2023.Most participants aged 18-26 (77.0%) and 6.3% of participants aged ≥46 (P < 0.001) had received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. Cervical cancer screening rates were positively associated with age: 70.5% of those aged 21-26 and 96.1% aged ≥46 (P < 0.001). Screening was negatively associated with male gender identity (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.42; P < 0.001), being uninsured (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.67; P < 0.001), and being unvaccinated against HPV (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.18-0.43; P < 0.001). 29.6% of those unscreened believed screening was not needed, and 22.1% were uncomfortable with pelvic exams. 40.4% of all participants would prefer self-collection for screening. Our findings indicate opportunities to increase screening and vaccination. Among under-screened individuals, lack of knowledge about screening necessity and discomfort with pelvic exams were important barriers. Targeted interventions addressing patient knowledge, practitioner communication, and exploring self-screening strategies are warranted.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSexual and Gender MinoritiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesPapillomavirus VaccinesCancer screeningHuman papillomavirusLGBTQI+Vaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.