Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235512›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2025

Multimodal creativity assessments following acute and sustained microdosing of lysergic acid diethylamide.

Robin J Murphy, Rachael L Sumner, Kate Godfrey, Acima Mabidikama, Reece P Roberts, Frederick Sundram, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin J MurphySchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. robin.murphy@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-0050
Rachael L SumnerSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kate GodfreyCentre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Acima MabidikamaSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Reece P RobertsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Frederick SundramDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Suresh MuthukumaraswamySchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnhanced creativity is often cited as an effect of microdosing (taking repeated low doses of a psychedelic drug). There have been recent efforts to validate the reported effects of microdosing, however creativity remains a difficult construct to quantify.

objectivesThe current study aimed to assess microdosing's effects on creativity using a multimodal battery of tests as part of a randomised controlled trial of microdosing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).

methodsEighty healthy adult males were given 10 µg doses of LSD or placebo every third day for six weeks (14 total doses). Creativity tasks were administered at a drug-free baseline session, at a first dosing session during the acute phase of the drug's effects, and in a drug-free final session following the six-week microdosing regimen. Creativity tasks were the Alternate Uses Test (AUT), Remote Associates Task (RAT), Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), and an Everyday Problem-Solving Questionnaire (EPSQ).

resultsNo effect of drug by time was found on the AUT, RAT, CAT, or EPSQ. Baseline vocabulary skill had a significant effect on AUT and RAT scores.

conclusionsDespite participants reporting feeling more creative on dose days, objective measurement found no acute or durable effects of the microdosing protocol on creativity. Possible explanations of these null findings are that laboratory testing conditions may negatively affect ability to detect naturalistic differences in creative performance, the tests available do not capture the facets of creativity that are anecdotally affected by microdosing, or that reported enhancements of creativity are placebo effects.

Indexed as

CreativityHallucinogensLysergic Acid DiethylamideAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsProblem SolvingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHallucinogensLysergic Acid DiethylamideConvergent thinkingCreativityLysergic acid diethylamideMicrodosing divergent thinkingPsychedelics

Identifiers

PMID39235512
PMCPMC11775047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.