ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Coital Incontinence: A Multicentre Study Evaluating Prevalence and Associations.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chair-Based Magnetic Pelvic Floor Stimulation and Female Sexual Function in Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisCoital incontinence (CI) is common, with a significant impact on quality of life and sexual function. This multicentre study was aimed at measuring the association between overactive bladder (OAB), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and different aspects of CI including orgasm and penetration incontinence.
methodsFollowing ethical approval, data from the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Pelvic Floor patient-reported outcome measure was collated for Urogynaecology outpatients from seven participating UK Hospitals between April 2018 and January 2022. Data were anonymised and analysed centrally using Excel.
resultsA total of 12,877 responses were obtained, of which 4,843 were valid for inclusion. 79.3% of women presented with urinary incontinence of whom 41.6% also reported CI. 96.8% of women with CI reported mixed OAB and SUI, with 2.1% and 1.1% reporting pure OAB and SUI respectively. There was a small subset (2.4%) with no overt urinary incontinence who occasionally experienced CI. Spearman's rank-order correlation demonstrated a statistically significant association between CI symptom score with both SUI (R = 0.57, p < 0.001) and OAB (R = 0.40, p < 0.001); orgasm incontinence with SUI (R = 0.49, p < 0.001) and OAB (R = 0.36, P < 0.001); penetration incontinence with SUI (R = 0.48, p < 0.001) and OAB (R = 0.35, p < 0.001).
conclusionsCoital incontinence is experienced by 42% of women with urinary incontinence. There is a statistically significant association between both SUI and OAB with orgasm incontinence and penetration incontinence, suggesting (a) common underlying mechanism(s). Limitations of this study include the large amount of missing data and the NHS outpatient setting that limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39235505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.