ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Clinical features, imaging use, and management in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of patients with major relapse in giant cell arteritis: a multicenter case-control study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Invasive Aspergillosis with Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis Following High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy: A Challenging Case of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the characteristics of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), the utilization of imaging in GCA diagnosis, and variations in GCA management among specialties. Subjects were identified from the Dallas VAMC database spanning 2010 to 2021 using ICD-9/10 codes for GCA and polymyalgia rheumatica, and a list of temporal artery biopsies (TAB). Patients lacking sufficient data to meet the ACR 1990 classification criteria for GCA were excluded. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Among 209 identified patients, 41 were excluded due to insufficient data for ACR classification. The cohort comprised 91.9% males with a median age of 69. Of the remaining 168 patients, 42 received a final diagnosis of GCA, and 15 of these were confirmed with a positive TAB. The most reported initial symptoms were visual disturbances (75.5%) and headaches (67.7%). Ophthalmology was the initial physician for 46% of patients. GCA correlated with co-existing autoimmune diseases, glucocorticoid-sparing treatments, and consultation with a rheumatologist (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical features or management of the positive and negative TAB GCA groups. GCA presents with heterogeneous symptoms making diagnosis challenging. Scalp tenderness and headaches were significantly higher in GCA patients, but sub-group analysis revealed no significant differences among GCA patients. Vascular assessments and adjunct imaging modalities are underutilized. The establishment of multidisciplinary or fast-track clinics may enhance the optimization of GCA management. Key Points • The most common presenting symptoms were blurry vision/visual loss (75.5%), headache (67.7%), and scalp tenderness (35.9%) in descending order. • In sub-group analysis, no significant differences were found between GCA sub-groups, but when compared to the non-GCA group, were found to have significantly higher rates of headache and scalp tenderness. • Compared to other specialties, rheumatologists were more likely to use advanced imaging, and to prescribe glucocorticoid-sparing treatments. • Systematic and comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approach could improve diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39235497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.