Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235485›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2024

Innovation at the Interface between Academia and Industry: The BioMed X Model.

Flavia-Bianca Cristian, Christian Tidona, Thomas Rückle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Flavia-Bianca CristianBioMed X Institute, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian TidonaBioMed X Institute, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas RückleBioMed X Institute, Heidelberg, Germany. tr@bio.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of biomedical research, the convergence of molecular biology and translational medicine has ushered in a new era of pharmaceutical innovation. This paradigm shift, characterized by significant advances in targeted therapies and gene editing, emphasizes the critical role of integrating academic research - and academic researchers - within industry settings. Contemporary innovation models are moving beyond traditional, corporation-centered frameworks, adopting more open, collaborative approaches. Here, we discuss the challenges and solutions brought about by this new direction in pharma innovation and describe the BioMed X innovation model, a unique open innovation approach that has been growing continuously over the past ten years.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryAcademiaBiomedical ResearchDiffusion of InnovationHumansTranslational Research, BiomedicalArtificial intelligenceBiomedical researchCareer developmentCrowdsourcingDrug discoveryEcosystem buildingIncubationOpen innovationTalent sourcing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.