Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39235402›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Generalizable Deep Learning for the Detection of Incomplete and Complete Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Outer Retinal Atrophy: A MACUSTAR Report.

Coen de Vente, Philippe Valmaggia, Carel B Hoyng, Frank G Holz, Mohammad M Islam, Caroline C W Klaver, Camiel J F Boon, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Adnan Tufail, Marlene Saßmannshausen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Coen de VenteQuantitative Healthcare Analysis (qurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philippe ValmaggiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universität Basel, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
Mohammad M IslamQuantitative Healthcare Analysis (qurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Camiel J F BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marlene SaßmannshausenDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
Clara I SánchezQuantitative Healthcare Analysis (qurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MACUSTAR Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm for detecting and quantifying incomplete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) and complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA) in optical coherence tomography (OCT) that generalizes well to data from different devices and to validate in an intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) cohort. Methods: The algorithm comprised a domain adaptation (DA) model, promoting generalization across devices, and a segmentation model for detecting granular biomarkers defining iRORA/cRORA, which are combined into iRORA/cRORA segmentations. Manual annotations of iRORA/cRORA in OCTs from different devices in the MACUSTAR study (168 patients with iAMD) were compared to the algorithm's output. Eye level classification metrics included sensitivity, specificity, and quadratic weighted Cohen's κ score (κw). Segmentation performance was assessed quantitatively using Bland-Altman plots and qualitatively. Results: For ZEISS OCTs, sensitivity and specificity for iRORA/cRORA classification were 38.5% and 93.1%, respectively, and 60.0% and 96.4% for cRORA. For Spectralis OCTs, these were 84.0% and 93.7% for iRORA/cRORA, and 62.5% and 97.4% for cRORA. The κw scores for 3-way classification (none, iRORA, and cRORA) were 0.37 and 0.73 for ZEISS and Spectralis, respectively. Removing DA reduced κw from 0.73 to 0.63 for Spectralis. Conclusions: The DA-enabled iRORA/cRORA segmentation algorithm showed superior consistency compared to human annotations, and good generalization across OCT devices. Translational Relevance: The application of this algorithm may help toward precise and automated tracking of iAMD-related lesion changes, which is crucial in clinical settings and multicenter longitudinal studies on iAMD.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMacular DegenerationRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAtrophyFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39235402
PMCPMC11379096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.