ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Assessing Visual Crowding in Participants With Preperimetric Glaucoma Using Eye Movement and Manual Response Paradigms.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring spatial and temporal properties of visual crowding using continuous psychophysics.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Elevated Visual Crowding in CRB1-Associated Retinopathies: Understanding Functional Visual Deficits Using Child-Friendly Computerized Testing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Crowding is the inability to distinguish objects in the periphery in the presence of clutter. Previous studies showed that crowding is elevated in patients with glaucoma. This could serve as an indicator of the functional visual performance of patients with glaucoma but at present appears too time-consuming and attentionally demanding. We examined visual crowding in individuals with preperimetric glaucoma to compare the potential effectiveness of eye movement-based and manual response paradigms. Methods: We assessed crowding magnitude in 10 participants with preperimetric glaucoma and 10 age-matched controls. Crowding magnitudes were assessed using four different paradigms: a conventional two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) manual, a 2AFC and a six-alternative forced choice (6AFC) eye movement, and a serial search paradigm. All paradigms measured crowding magnitude by comparing participants' orientation discrimination thresholds in isolated and flanked stimulus conditions. Moreover, assessment times and participant preferences were compared across paradigms. Results: Patients with preperimetric glaucoma exhibited elevated crowding, which was most evident in the manual-response paradigm. The serial search paradigm emerged as the fastest method for assessing thresholds, yet it could not effectively distinguish between glaucoma and control groups. The 6AFC paradigm proved challenging for both groups. Conclusions: We conclude that patients with preperimetric glaucoma demonstrate heightened binocular visual crowding. This is most effectively demonstrated via the 2AFC manual response paradigm. The additional attentional demand in eye movement paradigms rendered them less effective in the elderly population of the present study. Translational Relevance: Our findings underscore both the value and the complexity of efficiently evaluating crowding in elderly participants, including those with preperimetric glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.