ArticleLeukemia & lymphoma2024
The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R
Article in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study comparing the efficacy of R-CHOP and R-DA-EPOCH regimens in young, high-risk treatment-naïve diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Emerging Roles of Fc Receptor-Like 1 in Immunotherapy of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biocell : official journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica ... et. al · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.