Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234997›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2024

Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings.

Erin E Kent, Kelly R Tan, Zev M Nakamura, Jesse Kovacs, Mindy Gellin, Allison Deal, Eliza M Park, Maija Reblin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05828927 (enCompass Carolina), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05828927 nacompletednot on this map

enCompass Carolina: A Social Support and Coaching Program for Cancer Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled111ConditionsCancerArmsEco-mapping tool, Caregiver-coach study visits
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin E KentDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-2191
Kelly R TanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-3188
Zev M NakamuraLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9695-1457
Jesse KovacsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Mindy GellinLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Allison DealLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eliza M ParkLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Maija ReblinDepartment of Family Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X

Funding

Duke EndowmentUniversity of North Carolina University Cancer Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural cancer caregivers experience obstacles in accessing services, obtaining respite, and ensuring their care recipients receive quality care. These challenges warrant opportunities to participate in evidence-based behavioral intervention trials to fill support gaps. Adaptation to rural settings can facilitate appropriate fit, given higher caregiver service needs and unique challenges. We present findings from the adaptation process of a psychoeducational intervention designed to support cancer caregivers in rural settings.

methodsWe adapted Reblin's CARING intervention, designed for neuro-oncology, to target caregivers of rural cancer patients across cancer sites. First, we conducted formative work to determine the unmet social and supportive care needs rural cancer caregivers faced. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to guide the modifications. To conduct the adaptation, we elicited feedback through qualitative interviews of seven caregivers and three cancer hospital staff and thematic analysis to inform intervention modifications. Our qualitative study was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

resultsInterviews revealed that service access was a pressing need, along with financial (e.g., treatment costs, employment challenges) and geographic barriers (e.g., distance to treatment, road conditions). We modified content, training, and context using the FRAME-IS steps. Changes enhanced fit through the following adaptations: changes to social support domains, session content, interventionist training, resource offerings, screening and recruitment processes, and virtual delivery. DISCUSSION: Challenges to establishing successful psychosocial oncology interventions may be improved through participant-centered approaches and implementation science. Additional systemic challenges, including lack of systematic documentation of caregivers, persist and may especially disadvantage under-represented and underserved groups, such as rural dwellers. The enCompass intervention is undergoing ongoing single-arm pilot of rural cancer patient/caregiver dyads targeting caregiver coping self-efficacy and patient/caregiver distress (Clinical Trials #NCT05828927).

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsRural PopulationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Supportcaregiverdisseminationimplementation scienceinterventionpsycho‐oncologypsychosocialruralsocial support

Identifiers

PMID39234997
PMCPMC11375528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.