Trial reportReviews on recent clinical trials2025
Impact of Upright Position during the First Stage of Labour on Maternal Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Reviews on recent clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and predictors of dystocia during the active first stage of labor among mothers at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Amhara, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a 4-week nurse-led comprehensive rehabilitation program for women after mastectomy: A non-randomized control trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal position during delivery can affect the physiology of labour and the mechanics of childbirth.
objectiveThe study aimed to evaluate the impact of an upright position during the first stage of labour on maternal outcomes.
methodsThis parallel group randomised control trial was conducted from April to June 2020 among 60 women (30 each in the experimental and control groups) admitted to the selected hospital in Punjab, India. Women who entered the active stage of labour naturally with a single live foetus in cephalic presentation, aged 18-45 years, and with normal body mass index were randomly assigned either to the experimental or control group using a concealed envelope method. Women in the experimental group were informed and encouraged to adopt the upright position, while those in the control group received the standard routine care during the first stage of labour. The effectiveness of upright positions during the first stage of labour was assessed in terms of duration of the first, second, and third stages of labour, mode of delivery, and perineal lacerations. Outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention. The differences in the groups were evaluated by mean, median, frequency, percentage, Chi-square, and t-test.
resultsThe results of 60 women were analysed. Women in the experimental group experienced a significant reduction in the incidence of instrumental delivery (p =0.005), perineal laceration (p =0.001), and duration of the first stage (p =0.0001) and third stage (p =0.0001) of labour compared to those in the control group. No harm was reported across the study groups.
conclusionThis study urges nurses and midwives to recommend the use of upright positions during the first stage of labour to reduce the duration of labour and incidence of perineal laceration among women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39234912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.