ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2024
Beyond power limits: the kinetic energy capacity of skeletal muscle.
Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A striking difference: biomechanics of the impaling hunting strategy of a moss mantis.Frontiers in zoology · 2026Article
- Versatile artificial muscles by decoupling anisotropy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Optimal Gearing of Musculoskeletal Systems.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024Article
- Dynamic similarity and the peculiar allometry of maximum running speed.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle is the universal agent of animal movement, and limits to muscle performance are therefore an integral aspect of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution. A mechanical perspective on movement makes it amenable to analysis from first principles, and so brings the seeming certitude of simple physical laws to the challenging comparative study of complex biological systems. Early contributions on movement biomechanics considered muscle energy output to be limited by muscle work capacity, Wmax; triggered by seminal work in the late 1960s, it is now held broadly that a complete analysis of muscle energy output must also consider muscle power capacity, for no unit of work can be delivered in arbitrarily brief time. Here, we adopt a critical stance towards this paradigmatic notion of a power limit, and argue that the alternative constraint to muscle energy output is imposed instead by a characteristic kinetic energy capacity, Kmax, dictated by the maximum speed with which the actuating muscle can shorten. The two critical energies can now be directly compared, and define the physiological similarity index, Γ=Kmax/Wmax. It is the explanatory power of this comparison that lends weight to a shift in perspective from muscle power to kinetic energy capacity, as is argued through a series of illustrative examples. Γ emerges as an important dimensionless number in musculoskeletal dynamics, and sparks novel hypotheses on functional adaptations in musculoskeletal 'design' that depart from the parsimonious evolutionary null hypothesis of geometric similarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.