Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234650›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Knowledge of medications for opioid use disorder and associated stigma among primary care professionals.

Hannah Piscalko, Lindsay Y Dhanani, Daniel Brook, O Trent Hall, William C Miller, Vivian Go, Janet E Simon, Berkeley Franz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah PiscalkoCollege of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Lindsay Y DhananiSchool of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Daniel BrookCollege of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
O Trent HallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-7067-763X
William C MillerGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Vivian GoGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Janet E SimonCollege of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Berkeley FranzHeritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH.

Funding

Developing a Tailored Stigma Reduction Intervention to Increase Buprenorphine Prescribing among Rural Primary Care Providers in OhioR34DA057160 · NIDA · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANZ, BERKELEY · 2022 to 2024
$698k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA057160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are the gold standard. However, significant barriers limit their use in the primary care setting, including limited knowledge of the medications and stigmatizing attitudes. In this study, we assess knowledge levels among primary care-aligned professionals (PCPs) currently in practice, and whether knowledge of MOUD is associated with stigma and treatment attitudes. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsUsing rosters from the state of Ohio licensing boards, we surveyed 403 physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician associates in 2022, on the mechanism of different MOUD, as well as stigma and treatment attitudes. To assess MOUD knowledge, we employed descriptive and bivariate statistics. We fit four linear regression models, which controlled for empathy towards patients with OUD and provider demographics to assess the relationship between MOUD knowledge and four endpoints: stigma, perceived controllability of opioid use, perceived vulnerability to opioid use disorder, and support for abstinence-only treatment.

results43% of participants correctly identified the mechanism of all 3 medications whereas 13% of participants did not identify the mechanism of any MOUD correctly. MOUD knowledge was higher among physicians as compared to nurse practitioners and physician associates. Lower MOUD knowledge was associated with more negative attitudes towards patients with OUD and MOUD treatment.

conclusionExpanding access to MOUD treatment requires a trained and willing health-care professional (HCP) workforce. Our findings highlight considerable variation in clinician knowledge of MOUD and suggest that knowledge levels are also related to negative attitudes towards patients with OUD and MOUD. Training interventions that increase knowledge, as well as focus on stigma reduction, are critical for reducing the longstanding treatment gap for opioid use disorder.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareSocial StigmaAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersOhioOpiate Substitution TreatmentPhysicians, Primary CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidaddictionbuprenorphinemethadoneOpioid-related disordersprimary caretraining

Identifiers

PMID39234650
PMCPMC11378676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.